Literature DB >> 16485426

Validation of GATE Monte Carlo simulations of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanners.

C Ross Schmidtlein1, Assen S Kirov, Sadek A Nehmeh, Yusuf E Erdi, John L Humm, Howard I Amols, Luc M Bidaut, Alex Ganin, Charles W Stearns, David L McDaniel, Klaus A Hamacher.   

Abstract

The recently developed GATE (GEANT4 application for tomographic emission) Monte Carlo package, designed to simulate positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanners, provides the ability to model and account for the effects of photon noncollinearity, off-axis detector penetration, detector size and response, positron range, photon scatter, and patient motion on the resolution and quality of PET images. The objective of this study is to validate a model within GATE of the General Electric (GE) Advance/Discovery Light Speed (LS) PET scanner. Our three-dimensional PET simulation model of the scanner consists of 12 096 detectors grouped into blocks, which are grouped into modules as per the vendor's specifications. The GATE results are compared to experimental data obtained in accordance with the National Electrical Manufactures Association/Society of Nuclear Medicine (NEMA/SNM), NEMA NU 2-1994, and NEMA NU 2-2001 protocols. The respective phantoms are also accurately modeled thus allowing us to simulate the sensitivity, scatter fraction, count rate performance, and spatial resolution. In-house software was developed to produce and analyze sinograms from the simulated data. With our model of the GE Advance/Discovery LS PET scanner, the ratio of the sensitivities with sources radially offset 0 and 10 cm from the scanner's main axis are reproduced to within 1% of measurements. Similarly, the simulated scatter fraction for the NEMA NU 2-2001 phantom agrees to within less than 3% of measured values (the measured scatter fractions are 44.8% and 40.9 +/- 1.4% and the simulated scatter fraction is 43.5 +/- 0.3%). The simulated count rate curves were made to match the experimental curves by using deadtimes as fit parameters. This resulted in deadtime values of 625 and 332 ns at the Block and Coincidence levels, respectively. The experimental peak true count rate of 139.0 kcps and the peak activity concentration of 21.5 kBq/cc were matched by the simulated results to within 0.5% and 0.1% respectively. The simulated count rate curves also resulted in a peak NECR of 35.2 kcps at 10.8 kBq/cc compared to 37.6 kcps at 10.0 kBq/cc from averaged experimental values. The spatial resolution of the simulated scanner matched the experimental results to within 0.2 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16485426     DOI: 10.1118/1.2089447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  A Real Time Coincidence System for High Count-Rate TOF or Non-TOF PET Cameras Using Hybrid Method Combining AND-Logic and Time-Mark Technology.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Hongdi Li; Rocio A Ramirez; Yuxuan Zhang; Hossain Baghaei; Shitao Liu; Shaohui An; Wai-Hoi Wong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Patients with patellofemoral pain exhibit elevated bone metabolic activity at the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Michael Fredericson; Garry E Gold; Thor F Besier; Scott L Delp; Gary S Beaupre; Andrew Quon
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Peter F Martone; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-05

5.  Initial performance studies of a wearable brain positron emission tomography camera based on autonomous thin-film digital Geiger avalanche photodiode arrays.

Authors:  Charles R Schmidtlein; James N Turner; Michael O Thompson; Krishna C Mandal; Ida Häggström; Jiahan Zhang; John L Humm; David H Feiglin; Andrzej Krol
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-22

6.  MCAT to XCAT: The Evolution of 4-D Computerized Phantoms for Imaging Research: Computer models that take account of body movements promise to provide evaluation and improvement of medical imaging devices and technology.

Authors:  W Paul Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.961

7.  Dynamic PET simulator via tomographic emission projection for kinetic modeling and parametric image studies.

Authors:  Ida Häggström; Bradley J Beattie; C Ross Schmidtlein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  An alternative approach to histopathological validation of PET imaging for radiation therapy image-guidance: a proof of concept.

Authors:  Marian Axente; Jun He; Christopher P Bass; Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan; Jamal Zweit; Jeffrey F Williamson; Andrei Pugachev
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  68Ga-DOTANOC: biodistribution and dosimetry in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  C Pettinato; A Sarnelli; M Di Donna; S Civollani; C Nanni; G Montini; D Di Pierro; M Ferrari; M Marengo; C Bergamini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Emission guided radiation therapy for lung and prostate cancers: a feasibility study on a digital patient.

Authors:  Qiyong Fan; Akshay Nanduri; Samuel Mazin; Lei Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.