Literature DB >> 18574308

Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes.

L R Macdonald1, R E Schmitz, A M Alessio, S D Wollenweber, C W Stearns, A Ganin, R L Harrison, T K Lewellen, P E Kinahan.   

Abstract

We measured count rates and scatter fraction on the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in conventional 2D and 3D acquisition modes, and in a partial collimation mode between 2D and 3D. As part of the evaluation of using partial collimation, we estimated global count rates using a scanner model that combined computer simulations with an empirical live-time function. Our measurements followed the NEMA NU2 count rate and scatter-fraction protocol to obtain true, scattered and random coincidence events, from which noise equivalent count (NEC) rates were calculated. The effect of patient size was considered by using 27 cm and 35 cm diameter phantoms, in addition to the standard 20 cm diameter cylindrical count-rate phantom. Using the scanner model, we evaluated two partial collimation cases: removing half of the septa (2.5D) and removing two-thirds of the septa (2.7D). Based on predictions of the model, a 2.7D collimator was constructed. Count rates and scatter fractions were then measured in 2D, 2.7D and 3D. The scanner model predicted relative NEC variation with activity, as confirmed by measurements. The measured 2.7D NEC was equal or greater than 3D NEC for all activity levels in the 27 cm and 35 cm phantoms. In the 20 cm phantom, 3D NEC was somewhat higher ( approximately 15%) than 2.7D NEC at 100 MBq. For all higher activity concentrations, 2.7D NEC was greater and peaked 26% above the 3D peak NEC. The peak NEC in 2.7D mode occurred at approximately 425 MBq, and was 26-50% greater than the peak 3D NEC, depending on object size. NEC in 2D was considerably lower, except at relatively high activity concentrations. Partial collimation shows promise for improved noise equivalent count rates in clinical imaging without altering other detector parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18574308      PMCID: PMC2585489          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/14/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  A 2D/3D hybrid PET scanner with rotating partial slice-septa and its quantitative procedures.

Authors:  E Tanaka; T Hasegawa; T Yamashita; H Okada; H Murayama
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  [Reduction of radiation exposure in PET examinations by data acquisition in the 3D mode].

Authors:  G Brix; L E Adam; J Zaers; H Trojan; M E Bellemann; D Nosske; J Doll
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  Survey of parallel slat collimator designs for hybrid PET imaging.

Authors:  T C Rust; D J Kadrmas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.

Authors:  Ruth E Schmitz; Robert L Harrison; Charles W Stearns; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  R R Raylman; P V Kison; R L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-01

7.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; G Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies.

Authors:  J R Votaw; M White
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Quantitative Brain PET. Comparison of 2D and 3D Acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner.

Authors:  Vijay Dhawan; Ken Kazumata; William Robeson; Abdelfatihe Belakhlef; Claude Margouleff; Thomas Chaly; Toshitaka Nakamura; Robert Dahl; Donald Margouleff; David Eidelberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1998-03

10.  A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.

Authors:  Carole Lartizien; Paul E Kinahan; Claude Comtat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Low-dose radiation protocol using 3D mode in a BGO PET/CT.

Authors:  Solange A Nogueira; Renato Dimenstein; Marcelo L Cunha; Jairo Wagner; Marcelo B G Funari; Henrique M Lederman
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2013-02-01

5.  Acquisition time optimization of positron emission tomography studies by use of a regression function derived from torso cross-sections and noise-equivalent counts.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kangai; Hideo Onishi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Monte Carlo simulation of digital photon counting PET.

Authors:  Julien Salvadori; Joey Labour; Freddy Odille; Pierre-Yves Marie; Jean-Noël Badel; Laëtitia Imbert; David Sarrut
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-04-25

7.  Transmission imaging for integrated PET-MR systems.

Authors:  Spencer L Bowen; Niccolò Fuin; Michael A Levine; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Spill-in counts in the quantification of 18F-florbetapir on Aβ-negative subjects: the effect of including white matter in the reference region.

Authors:  Francisco Javier López-González; Alexis Moscoso; Nikos Efthimiou; Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro; Manuel Piñeiro-Fiel; Stephen J Archibald; Pablo Aguiar; Jesús Silva-Rodríguez
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2019-12-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.