Literature DB >> 27081753

Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

Kuang Gong1, Stan Majewski, Paul E Kinahan, Robert L Harrison, Brian F Elston, Ravindra Manjeshwar, Sergei Dolinsky, Alexander V Stolin, Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis, Jinyi Qi.   

Abstract

The desire to understand normal and disordered human brain function of upright, moving persons in natural environments motivates the development of the ambulatory micro-dose brain PET imager (AMPET). An ideal system would be light weight but with high sensitivity and spatial resolution, although these requirements are often in conflict with each other. One potential approach to meet the design goals is a compact brain-only imaging device with a head-sized aperture. However, a compact geometry increases parallax error in peripheral lines of response, which increases bias and variance in region of interest (ROI) quantification. Therefore, we performed simulation studies to search for the optimal system configuration and to evaluate the potential improvement in quantification performance over existing scanners. We used the Cramér-Rao variance bound to compare the performance for ROI quantification using different scanner geometries. The results show that while a smaller ring diameter can increase photon detection sensitivity and hence reduce the variance at the center of the field of view, it can also result in higher variance in peripheral regions when the length of detector crystal is 15 mm or more. This variance can be substantially reduced by adding depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement capability to the detector modules. Our simulation study also shows that the relative performance depends on the size of the ROI, and a large ROI favors a compact geometry even without DOI information. Based on these results, we propose a compact 'helmet' design using detectors with DOI capability. Monte Carlo simulations show the helmet design can achieve four-fold higher sensitivity and resolve smaller features than existing cylindrical brain PET scanners. The simulations also suggest that improving TOF timing resolution from 400 ps to 200 ps also results in noticeable improvement in image quality, indicating better timing resolution is desirable for brain imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27081753      PMCID: PMC4863179          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti; Bernard Bendriem; Mike Casey; Mu Chen; Frank Kehren; Christian Michel; Vladimir Panin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Theoretical study of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Ronald H Huesman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging.

Authors:  Lisa Mosconi; Susan De Santi; Juan Li; Wai Hon Tsui; Yi Li; Madhu Boppana; Eugene Laska; Henry Rusinek; Mony J de Leon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs.

Authors:  J A Fessler; W L Rogers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography.

Authors:  A R De Pierro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Quantitative imaging of protein targets in the human brain with PET.

Authors:  Roger N Gunn; Mark Slifstein; Graham E Searle; Julie C Price
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Technical performance evaluation of a human brain PET/MRI system.

Authors:  Armin Kolb; Hans F Wehrl; Matthias Hofmann; Martin S Judenhofer; Lars Eriksson; Ralf Ladebeck; Matthias P Lichy; Larry Byars; Christian Michel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Matthias Schmand; Claus D Claussen; Vesna Sossi; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan K Poon; Magnus L Dahlbom; William W Moses; Karthik Balakrishnan; Wenli Wang; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Imaging dopamine receptors in the human brain by positron tomography.

Authors:  H N Wagner; H D Burns; R F Dannals; D F Wong; B Langstrom; T Duelfer; J J Frost; H T Ravert; J M Links; S B Rosenbloom; S E Lukas; A V Kramer; M J Kuhar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Sinogram Blurring Matrix Estimation From Point Sources Measurements With Rank-One Approximation for Fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jian Zhou; Michel Tohme; Martin Judenhofer; Yongfeng Yang; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Development of Dedicated Brain PET Imaging Devices: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Initial performance studies of a wearable brain positron emission tomography camera based on autonomous thin-film digital Geiger avalanche photodiode arrays.

Authors:  Charles R Schmidtlein; James N Turner; Michael O Thompson; Krishna C Mandal; Ida Häggström; Jiahan Zhang; John L Humm; David H Feiglin; Andrzej Krol
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-22

5.  PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning.

Authors:  Jianan Cui; Kuang Gong; Ning Guo; Chenxi Wu; Xiaxia Meng; Kyungsang Kim; Kun Zheng; Zhifang Wu; Liping Fu; Baixuan Xu; Zhaohui Zhu; Jiahe Tian; Huafeng Liu; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Design study of a dedicated head and neck cancer PET system.

Authors:  Mohan Li; Brett Yockey; Shiva Abbaszadeh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-08

7.  High-Resolution Depth-Encoding PET Detector Module with Prismatoid Light-Guide Array.

Authors:  Andy LaBella; Xinjie Cao; Eric Petersen; Rick Lubinsky; Anat Biegon; Wei Zhao; Amir H Goldan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Lesion detection and quantification performance of the Tachyon-I time-of-flight PET scanner: phantom and human studies.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Qiyu Peng; Jian Zhou; Jennifer S Huber; William W Moses; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Direct Patlak Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data Using the Kernel Method With MRI Information Based on Structural Similarity.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jinxiu Cheng-Liao; Guobao Wang; Kevin T Chen; Ciprian Catana; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Iterative PET Image Reconstruction Using Convolutional Neural Network Representation.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.