PURPOSE: The PET tracer (82)Rb is commonly used to evaluate regional perfusion defects for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. There is limited information on the quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with this tracer. The goal of this study was to investigate the use of a one-compartment model of (82)Rb kinetics for the quantification of myocardial blood flow. METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent rest and dipyridamole stress imaging with both (13)N-ammonia and (82)Rb within a 2-week interval. Myocardial blood flow was estimated from the time-activity curves measured with (13)N-ammonia using a standard two-compartment model. The uptake parameter of the one-compartment model was estimated from the time-activity curves measured with (82)Rb. To describe the relationship between myocardial blood flow and the uptake parameter, a nonlinear extraction function was fitted to the data. This function was then used to convert estimates of the uptake parameter to flow estimates. The extraction function was validated with an independent data set obtained from 13 subjects with documented evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: The one-compartment model described (82)Rb kinetics very well (median R-square = 0.98). The flow estimates obtained with (82)Rb were well correlated with those obtained with (13)N-ammonia (r = 0.85), and the best-fit line did not differ significantly from the identity line. Data obtained from the subjects with CAD confirmed the validity of the estimated extraction function. CONCLUSION: It is possible to obtain accurate estimates of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with a one-compartment model of (82)Rb kinetics and a nonlinear extraction function.
PURPOSE: The PET tracer (82)Rb is commonly used to evaluate regional perfusion defects for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. There is limited information on the quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with this tracer. The goal of this study was to investigate the use of a one-compartment model of (82)Rb kinetics for the quantification of myocardial blood flow. METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent rest and dipyridamole stress imaging with both (13)N-ammonia and (82)Rb within a 2-week interval. Myocardial blood flow was estimated from the time-activity curves measured with (13)N-ammonia using a standard two-compartment model. The uptake parameter of the one-compartment model was estimated from the time-activity curves measured with (82)Rb. To describe the relationship between myocardial blood flow and the uptake parameter, a nonlinear extraction function was fitted to the data. This function was then used to convert estimates of the uptake parameter to flow estimates. The extraction function was validated with an independent data set obtained from 13 subjects with documented evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: The one-compartment model described (82)Rb kinetics very well (median R-square = 0.98). The flow estimates obtained with (82)Rb were well correlated with those obtained with (13)N-ammonia (r = 0.85), and the best-fit line did not differ significantly from the identity line. Data obtained from the subjects with CAD confirmed the validity of the estimated extraction function. CONCLUSION: It is possible to obtain accurate estimates of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with a one-compartment model of (82)Rb kinetics and a nonlinear extraction function.
Authors: Klaus P Schäfers; Terence J Spinks; Paolo G Camici; Peter M Bloomfield; Christopher G Rhodes; Marilyn P Law; Christopher S R Baker; Ornella Rimoldi Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G D Hutchins; M Schwaiger; K C Rosenspire; J Krivokapich; H Schelbert; D E Kuhl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Benjamin J W Chow; Robert A dekemp; Stephanie Thorn; Terrence D Ruddy; Ross A Davies; Jean N DaSilva; Rob Beanlands Journal: Curr Pharm Des Date: 2005 Impact factor: 3.116
Authors: N A Mullani; R A Goldstein; K L Gould; S K Marani; D J Fisher; H A O'Brien; M D Loberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1983-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C Laubenbacher; J Rothley; J Sitomer; R Beanlands; S Sawada; R Sutor; D Muller; M Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Richard W Wassenaar Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ran Klein; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Stephanie L Thorn; Andy Adler; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Osamu Manabe; Chietsugu Katoh; Li Chen; Ran Klein; Masanao Naya; Robert A deKemp; Kathryn Williams; Rob S B Beanlands; Nagara Tamaki Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 9.236