Literature DB >> 22569720

Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA?

Nobuhiko Sugano1, Masaki Takao, Takashi Sakai, Takashi Nishii, Hidenobu Miki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although navigated THA provides improved precision in implant positioning and alignment, it is unclear whether these translate into long-term implant survival. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared survivorship, dislocation rate, and incidence of radiographic failures such as loosening and bearing breakage after THA with and without navigation at a minimum 10-year followup.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients (60 hips) and 97 patients (120 hips) receiving THA with or without a CT-based navigation system, respectively, using cementless THA ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples. There were no differences in age, sex, diagnosis, height, weight, BMI, or preoperative clinical score between groups. We evaluated survivorship, mode of acetabular and femoral component fixation, osteolysis, and implant wear or breakage at a minimum followup of 10 years (average, 11 years; range, 10-13 years).
RESULTS: Survival at 13 years was 100% with navigation and 95.6% (95% CI, 88.4%-98.4%) without navigation. With navigation, all cups were placed within a zone of 40° (range, 30°-50°) of radiographic inclination and 15° (range, 5°-15°) of radiographic anteversion; without navigation, 31 cups (26%) were placed outside this zone. Hips treated without navigation had a higher rate of dislocation (8%) than the navigated cases (0%). Revision was performed in four nonnavigated cases, all of which showed evidence of neck impingement on the ceramic liner. Moreover, seven other cases without navigation showed posterior neck erosion on radiographs. These 11 impingement-related mechanical complications correlated with cup malorientation, and the incidence of impingement-related complications was higher in nonnavigated cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Navigation reduced the rates of dislocation and impingement-related mechanical complications leading to revision in cementless THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples over a minimum 10-year followup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22569720      PMCID: PMC3462880          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach.

Authors:  N Sugano; T Sasama; Y Sato; Y Nakajima; T Nishii; K Yonenobu; S Tamura; T Ochi
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2001

2.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side.

Authors:  C A Engh; A H Glassman; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Concerns about ceramics in THA.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Corey Burak; Harry B Skinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Todd Baldini; Margaret G Peterson; Timothy M Wright; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; S H Dysart; C G Savory
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement.

Authors:  B Zicat; C A Engh; E Gokcen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Mark C Callanan; Bryan Jarrett; Charles R Bragdon; David Zurakowski; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment.

Authors:  A M DiGioia; B Jaramaz; M Blackwell; D A Simon; F Morgan; J E Moody; C Nikou; B D Colgan; C A Aston; R S Labarca; E Kischell; T Kanade
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  21 in total

1.  The value of computed tomography based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Kuroda; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Shin Watanabe; Shintaro Iwai; Fujita Kenji; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Daisuke Inoue; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujishiro; Shinya Hayashi; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Masahiro Kurosaka; Taiki Kanno; Takeshi Masuda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakahara; Takayuki Kyo; Yasuo Kuroda; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  No Benefit After THA Performed With Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Alexandre Lunebourg; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reproducibility of length measurements of the lower limb by using EOS™.

Authors:  A Clavé; D G Maurer; N S Nagra; F Fazilleau; C Lefèvre; E Stindel
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 7.  Technology in Arthroplasty: Are We Improving Value?

Authors:  Bradford S Waddell; Kaitlin Carroll; Seth Jerabek
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

8.  Does accelerometer-based portable navigation provide more accurate and precise cup orientation without prosthetic impingement than conventional total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Masato Kiyohara; Satoshi Hamai; Kyohei Shiomoto; Satoru Harada; Tetsunari Harada; Goro Motomura; Satoshi Ikemura; Masanori Fujii; Shinya Kawahara; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Keisuke Uemura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kaku; Hiroaki Tagomori; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.