Bradford S Waddell1,2, Kaitlin Carroll3, Seth Jerabek3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA. Bradford.Waddell@ochsner.org. 2. Ochsner Clinical School, University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. Bradford.Waddell@ochsner.org. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Total joint arthroplasty is regarded as a highly successful procedure. Patient outcomes and implant longevity, however, are related to proper alignment and position of the prostehses. In an attempt to reduce outliers and improve accuracy and precision of component position, navigation and robotics have been introduced. These technologies, however, come at a price. The goals of this review are to evaluate these technologies in total joint arthroplasty and determine if they add value. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated that navigation and robotics in total joint arthroplasty can decrease outliers while improving accuracy in component positioning. While some studies have demonstrated improved patient reported outcomes, not all studies have shown this to be true. Most studies cite increased cost of equipment and longer operating room times as the major downsides of the technologies at present. Long-term studies are just becoming available and are promising, as some studies have shown decreased revision rates when navigation is used. Finally, there are relatively few studies evaluating the direct cost and value of these technologies. Navigation and robotics have been shown to improve component position in total joint arthroplasty, which can improve patient outcomes and implant longevity. These technologies offer a promising future for total joint arthroplasty.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Total joint arthroplasty is regarded as a highly successful procedure. Patient outcomes and implant longevity, however, are related to proper alignment and position of the prostehses. In an attempt to reduce outliers and improve accuracy and precision of component position, navigation and robotics have been introduced. These technologies, however, come at a price. The goals of this review are to evaluate these technologies in total joint arthroplasty and determine if they add value. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated that navigation and robotics in total joint arthroplasty can decrease outliers while improving accuracy in component positioning. While some studies have demonstrated improved patient reported outcomes, not all studies have shown this to be true. Most studies cite increased cost of equipment and longer operating room times as the major downsides of the technologies at present. Long-term studies are just becoming available and are promising, as some studies have shown decreased revision rates when navigation is used. Finally, there are relatively few studies evaluating the direct cost and value of these technologies. Navigation and robotics have been shown to improve component position in total joint arthroplasty, which can improve patient outcomes and implant longevity. These technologies offer a promising future for total joint arthroplasty.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arthroplasty; Cost; Navigation; Robotics; Technology; Value
Authors: Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Johannes Cip; Mark Widemschek; Matthias Luegmair; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Thomas Benesch; Arno Martin Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Arndt P Schulz; Klaus Seide; Christian Queitsch; Andrea von Haugwitz; Jan Meiners; Benjamin Kienast; Mohamad Tarabolsi; Michael Kammal; Christian Jürgens Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Nicholas L Kolodychuk; Jesse A Raszewski; Brian P Gladnick; Kurt J Kitziger; Paul C Peters; Bradford S Waddell Journal: Arthroplast Today Date: 2022-08-15