Literature DB >> 28687958

Technology in Arthroplasty: Are We Improving Value?

Bradford S Waddell1,2, Kaitlin Carroll3, Seth Jerabek3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Total joint arthroplasty is regarded as a highly successful procedure. Patient outcomes and implant longevity, however, are related to proper alignment and position of the prostehses. In an attempt to reduce outliers and improve accuracy and precision of component position, navigation and robotics have been introduced. These technologies, however, come at a price. The goals of this review are to evaluate these technologies in total joint arthroplasty and determine if they add value. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies have demonstrated that navigation and robotics in total joint arthroplasty can decrease outliers while improving accuracy in component positioning. While some studies have demonstrated improved patient reported outcomes, not all studies have shown this to be true. Most studies cite increased cost of equipment and longer operating room times as the major downsides of the technologies at present. Long-term studies are just becoming available and are promising, as some studies have shown decreased revision rates when navigation is used. Finally, there are relatively few studies evaluating the direct cost and value of these technologies. Navigation and robotics have been shown to improve component position in total joint arthroplasty, which can improve patient outcomes and implant longevity. These technologies offer a promising future for total joint arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Cost; Navigation; Robotics; Technology; Value

Year:  2017        PMID: 28687958      PMCID: PMC5577416          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9415-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  61 in total

1.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

3.  [Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  U Leichtle; N Gosselke; C J Wirth; M Rudert
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-01

4.  Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Bernd Kubista; Boris Olischar; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial.

Authors:  Johannes Cip; Mark Widemschek; Matthias Luegmair; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Thomas Benesch; Arno Martin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures.

Authors:  Arndt P Schulz; Klaus Seide; Christian Queitsch; Andrea von Haugwitz; Jan Meiners; Benjamin Kienast; Mohamad Tarabolsi; Michael Kammal; Christian Jürgens
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik J Novak; Marc D Silverstein; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Total Hip Arthroplasty - over 100 years of operative history.

Authors:  Stephen Richard Knight; Randeep Aujla; Satya Prasad Biswas
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2011-11-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Guidance With Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Zeitlin; Jensen Henry; Scott Ellis
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-07

2.  CT-Based 3D Reconstruction of Lower Limb Versus X-Ray-Based 3D Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis and Application for a Safe and Cost-Effective Modality in TKA.

Authors:  Vivek Shetty; Yash Wagh; Vikas Karade; Amit Maurya; Mangal Parihar; Sajeev Shekhar; Jignesh Tandel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Handheld Navigation Improves Accuracy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Nicholas L Kolodychuk; Jesse A Raszewski; Brian P Gladnick; Kurt J Kitziger; Paul C Peters; Bradford S Waddell
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.