Literature DB >> 2245564

The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side.

C A Engh1, A H Glassman, K E Suthers.   

Abstract

A series of 1163 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using porous-coated femoral components were roentgenographically assessed for implant fixation. For 959 primary THAs followed from two to 12 years, the femoral revision rate was 1% and the ten-year survivorship rate was 96.4%; 150 young patients had a fixation failure incidence of only 1.3% at a mean follow-up period of 6.4 years; in 204 revision THAs, the femoral re-revision rate was 4% at a mean follow-up period of 53.4 months. Failures were largely related to inadequate femoral canal filling. Because of refinements in implant design and surgical techniques, a press fit of the implant is currently achieved in 94% of cases compared to 36% during the first five years. Porous-coated femoral components have yielded results equivalent to those with cement in primary THAs. Excellent results were observed in relatively young patients and patients with revisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2245564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  51 in total

1.  [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems].

Authors:  M Prymka; M Vogiatzis; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA?

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Takashi Nishii; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total hip arthroplasty performed in patients with residual poliomyelitis: does it work?

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Young-Kyun Lee; Jeong Joon Yoo; Hee Joong Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using surface registration techniques: a short-term clinical report.

Authors:  Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Nishii; Hidenobu Miki; Akihiro Kakimoto; Mitsuyoshi Yamamura
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Nishii; Akihiro Kakimoto; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty with AML, PCA and HGP prostheses.

Authors:  S K Hwang; J S Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  B Fink
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Rosário Madero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Is the bone-bonding ability of a cementless total hip prosthesis enhanced by alkaline and heat treatments?

Authors:  Kazutaka So; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tadami Matsumoto; Shuichi Matsuda; Haruhiko Akiyama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 21 years: a minimum, 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Benoît J Bessette; François Fassier; Michael Tanzer; Caleb E Brooks
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.