Literature DB >> 29611147

Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Ichiro Nakahara1, Takayuki Kyo2, Yasuo Kuroda3, Hidenobu Miki3.   

Abstract

A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is one of the support tools to place implant with appropriate alignment and position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To determine whether the higher performance of the navigation would further improve the accuracy of implant placement in the clinical setting, we retrospectively compared the navigation accuracy of two different versions of a navigation system. The newer version of the navigation system had an upgraded optical sensor with superior positional accuracy. Navigation accuracy, defined as differences between postoperative measurements on CT images and intraoperative records on the navigation system, of 49 THAs performed with the newer version of the navigation system was compared with that of 49 THAs performed with the older version. With the newer version, the mean absolute accuracy (95% limits of agreement) of implant alignment was 1.2° (± 3.3°) for cup inclination, 1.0° (± 2.4°) for cup anteversion, 2.0° (± 4.9°) for stem anteversion, and 1.1° (± 2.4°) for stem valgus angle. The accuracy of the implant position was 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm), 1.3 mm (± 3.0 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm) for cup x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, 1.6 mm (± 3.2 mm), 1.4 mm (± 2.9 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 2.7 mm) for stem x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, and 2.4 mm (± 4.5 mm) for leg length discrepancy. The values for the newer version were significantly more accurate with less variation compared to those of the older version. With upgraded navigation performance, more accurate implant placement was demonstrated in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; CT-based navigation; Implant alignment; Implant position; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29611147     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-018-1041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  35 in total

1.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration.

Authors:  M Holden; D L Hill; E R Denton; J M Jarosz; T C Cox; T Rohlfing; J Goodey; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach.

Authors:  N Sugano; T Sasama; Y Sato; Y Nakajima; T Nishii; K Yonenobu; S Tamura; T Ochi
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2001

4.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

6.  Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results.

Authors:  Thomas Ybinger; W Kumpan; H E Hoffart; B Muschalik; W Bullmann; K Zweymüller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches.

Authors:  Takehito Hananouchi; Masaki Takao; Takashi Nishii; Hidenobu Miki; Daiki Iwana; Hideki Yoshikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.547

8.  Accuracy of angle and position of the cup using computed tomography-based navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daiki Iwana; Nobuo Nakamura; Hidenobu Miki; Makoto Kitada; Takehito Hananouchi; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2013-07-17

9.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

10.  Does degree of the pelvic deformity affect the accuracy of computed tomography-based hip navigation?

Authors:  Yoshitomo Kajino; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Shintaro Iwai; Kazunari Kuroda; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  6 in total

1.  Image-Less THA Cup Navigation in Clinical Routine Setup: Individual Adjustments, Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness.

Authors:  Corinne A Zurmühle; Benjamin Zickmantel; Matthias Christen; Bernhard Christen; Guoyan Zheng; Joseph M Schwab; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

2.  Accuracy of a novel accelerometer-based navigation (Naviswiss) for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Yohei Naito; Shine Tone; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  The accuracy of acetabular cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty using an image-free navigation system.

Authors:  Yohei Naito; Masahiro Hasegawa; Shine Tone; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  A method combining the use of a mobile application and a dedicated pelvic positioner for acetabular cup insertion.

Authors:  Atsushi Kamimura; Makoto Enokida; Shinpei Enokida; Hideki Nagashima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position.

Authors:  Tomonori Tetsunaga; Kazuki Yamada; Tomoko Tetsunaga; Tomoaki Sanki; Yoshi Kawamura; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 6.  Total hip arthroplasty planning.

Authors:  Alessandro Colombi; Daniele Schena; Claudio Carlo Castelli
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.