Literature DB >> 22517054

Measurement of patient imaging dose for real-time kilovoltage x-ray intrafraction tumour position monitoring in prostate patients.

James K Crocker1, Jin Aun Ng, Paul J Keall, Jeremy T Booth.   

Abstract

The dose for image-based motion monitoring of prostate tumours during radiotherapy delivery has not been established. This study aimed to provide quantitative analysis and optimization of the fluoroscopic patient imaging dose during radiotherapy for IMRT and VMAT treatments using standard and hypofractionated treatment schedules. Twenty-two patients with type T1c N0/M0 prostate cancer and three implanted fiducial markers were considered. Minimum field sizes encompassing all fiducial markers plus a 7.5 mm motion margin were determined for each treatment beam, each patient and the complete cohort. Imaging doses were measured for different field sizes and depths in a phantom at 75 and 120 kV. Based on these measurements, the patient imaging doses were then estimated according to beam-on time for clinical settings. The population minimum field size was 5.3 × 6.1 cm², yielding doses of 406 and 185 mGy over the course of an IMRT treatment for 75 kV (10 mAs) and 120 kV (1.04 mAs) imaging respectively, at 1 Hz. The imaging dose was reduced by an average of 28% and 32% by adopting patient-specific and treatment-beam-specific field sizes respectively. Standard fractionation VMAT imaging doses were 37% lower than IMRT doses over a complete treatment. Hypofractionated IMRT stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and VMAT SBRT imaging doses were 58% and 76% lower than IMRT doses respectively. The patient dose for kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring of the prostate was quantified. Tailoring imaging field sizes to specific patients yielded a significant reduction in the imaging dose, as did adoption of faster treatment modalities such as VMAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22517054      PMCID: PMC3369877          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/2969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells.

Authors:  W Göggelmann; C Jacobsen; W Panzer; L Walsh; H Roos; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Real-time intra-fraction-motion tracking using the treatment couch: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Warren D D'Souza; Shahid A Naqvi; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy.

Authors:  Patrick Kupelian; Twyla Willoughby; Arul Mahadevan; Toufik Djemil; Geoffrey Weinstein; Shirish Jani; Charles Enke; Timothy Solberg; Nicholas Flores; David Liu; David Beyer; Lisa Levine
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).

Authors:  R J Aukett; J E Burns; A G Greener; R M Harrison; C Moretti; A E Nahum; K E Rosser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  RBE of 20 kV and 70 kV X-rays determined for survival of V 79 cells.

Authors:  M Bistrović; M Bisćan; T Viculin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Renaud de Crevoisier; Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Radhe Mohan; Rex Cheung; James D Cox; Deborah A Kuban
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Twyla R Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks; Anand Santhanam; Alexis Cunningham; Lisa Levine; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Assessment of secondary patient motion induced by automated couch movement during on-line 6 dimensional repositioning in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Nadine Linthout; Dirk Verellen; Koen Tournel; Truus Reynders; Michael Duchateau; Guy Storme
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Accurate patient dosimetry of kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy.

Authors:  George X Ding; Dennis M Duggan; Charles W Coffey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of reproducibility of tumor repositioning during multiple breathing cycles for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Ludovic Bedos; Olivier Riou; Norbert Aillères; Antoine Braccini; Jessica Molinier; Carmen Llacer Moscardo; David Azria; Pascal Fenoglietto
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-11-12

2.  Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring for prostate intensity modulated arc therapy: first clinical results.

Authors:  Jin Aun Ng; Jeremy T Booth; Per R Poulsen; Walther Fledelius; Esben Schjødt Worm; Thomas Eade; Fiona Hegi; Andrew Kneebone; Zdenka Kuncic; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Intrafractional 3D localization using kilovoltage digital tomosynthesis for sliding-window intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Margie Hunt; Hai Pham; Grace Tang; Gig Mageras
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Estimation of effective imaging dose for kilovoltage intratreatment monitoring of the prostate position during cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  J A Ng; J Booth; P Poulsen; Z Kuncic; P J Keall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Technical note: TROG 15.01 SPARK trial multi-institutional imaging dose measurement.

Authors:  Kimberley Legge; Peter B Greer; Paul J Keall; Jeremy T Booth; Sankar Arumugam; Trevor Moodie; Doan T Nguyen; Jarad Martin; Daryl John O'Connor; Joerg Lehmann
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.