Literature DB >> 14551783

Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells.

W Göggelmann1, C Jacobsen, W Panzer, L Walsh, H Roos, E Schmid.   

Abstract

Neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells was examined after exposure to 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) and conventional 220 kV x-rays. The study was designed to repeat, under well-defined irradiation and culture conditions, an earlier investigation by Frankenberg et al. (Radiat Res, 2002), and to assess the validity of the high RBE values of 29 kV x-rays that had been reported. The experiments with the two types of x-rays were performed simultaneously and shared the same controls. The transformation yields with both radiation qualities were fitted to the linear-quadratic dependence on absorbed dose, and a corresponding analysis was performed for the data earlier obtained by Frankenberg et al. The transformation yields in the present study exceed those in the earlier investigation substantially, and it appears that the difference reflects inadequate feeding conditions of the cell cultures in the early experiments. The standard error bands of the dose response curves are derived and are seen to be considerably more narrow in the present results. The lowest dose of the 29 kV x-rays was 1 Gy in both studies, and at this dose the RBE vs. the conventional x-rays has now been found to be 2 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.4-2.6. The previous result was about 3.2, but the 95% confidence is very broad for these data. The estimated limit at low doses is 3.4 in the present experiments with a confidence interval that extends from less than 2 to large values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551783     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-003-0210-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  22 in total

1.  Error bands for the linear-quadratic dose-effect relation.

Authors:  A M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with a triple combination of composite whole chromosome-specific DNA probes.

Authors:  E Schmid; H Zitzelsberger; H Braselmann; J W Gray; M Bauchinger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Loss of suppressor loci on chromosomes 11 and 14 may be required for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of HeLa x skin fibroblast human cell hybrids.

Authors:  M S Mendonca; K Howard; C L Fasching; D L Farrington; L A Desmond; E J Stanbridge; J L Redpath
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Alpha-particle-induced neoplastic transformation in synchronized hybrid cells of HeLa and human skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  D Bettega; P Calzolari; A Piazzolla; L Tallone; J L Redpath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Enhanced risk from low-energy screen--film mammography X rays.

Authors:  D J Brenner; H I Amols
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A tumor-specific membrane phosphoprotein marker in human cell hybrids.

Authors:  C J Der; E J Stanbridge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The effect of 29 kV X rays on the dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  E Schmid; D Regulla; H-M Kramer; D Harder
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Is there reliable experimental evidence for a low-dose RBE of about 4 for mammography X rays relative to 200 kV X rays?

Authors:  Ernst Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells by gamma radiation: a quantitative assay.

Authors:  J L Redpath; C Sun; M Colman; E J Stanbridge
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Characterization of intestinal alkaline phosphatase expression and the tumorigenic potential of gamma-irradiated HeLa x fibroblast cell hybrids.

Authors:  M S Mendonca; R J Antoniono; K M Latham; E J Stanbridge; J L Redpath
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  15 in total

1.  Comment on "re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells" by W. Göggelmann, C. Jacobsen, W. Panzer et al. (2003) Radiat Environ Biophys 42:175-182.

Authors:  Dietrich Harder
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Response to the comment on "re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells" by W. Göggelmann, C. Jacobsen, W. Panzer, L. Walsh, H. Roos, E. Schmid (2003) Radiat Environ Biophys 42:175-182.

Authors:  Ernst Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  FISH-based analysis of 10- and 25-kV soft X-ray-induced DNA damage in 184A1 human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  E Beyreuther; W Dörr; A Lehnert; E Lessmann; J Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Experimental and Monte Carlo-simulated spectra of standard mammography-quality beams.

Authors:  M G David; E J Pires; M A Bernal; J G Peixoto; C E Dealmeida
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The Future of Breast Cancer Diagnostics.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; Susanne Diekmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  RBE of 25 kV X-rays for the survival and induction of micronuclei in the human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-12A.

Authors:  Anna Lehnert; Elisabeth Lessmann; Jörg Pawelke; Wolfgang Dörr
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  [Mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  S Diekmann; F Diekmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Relative biological effectiveness of 25 and 10 kV X-rays for the induction of chromosomal aberrations in two human mammary epithelial cell lines.

Authors:  Elke Beyreuther; Wolfgang Dörr; Anna Lehnert; Elisabeth Lessmann; Jörg Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 9.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Manning; K Rothkamm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Dose-response relationship of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes obtained for the fission neutron therapy facility MEDAPP at the research reactor FRM II.

Authors:  E Schmid; F M Wagner; H Romm; L Walsh; H Roos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.