Literature DB >> 17187940

Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy.

Patrick Kupelian1, Twyla Willoughby, Arul Mahadevan, Toufik Djemil, Geoffrey Weinstein, Shirish Jani, Charles Enke, Timothy Solberg, Nicholas Flores, David Liu, David Beyer, Lisa Levine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the clinical experience with an electromagnetic treatment target positioning and continuous monitoring system in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Calypso System is a target positioning device that continuously monitors the location of three implanted electromagnetic transponders at a rate of 10 Hz. The system was used at five centers to position 41 patients over a full course of therapy. Electromagnetic positioning was compared to setup using skin marks and to stereoscopic X-ray localization of the transponders. Continuous monitoring was performed in 35 patients.
RESULTS: The difference between skin mark vs. the Calypso System alignment was found to be >5 mm in vector length in more than 75% of fractions. Comparisons between the Calypso System and X-ray localization showed good agreement. Qualitatively, the continuous motion was unpredictable and varied from persistent drift to transient rapid movements. Displacements > or =3 and > or =5 mm for cumulative durations of at least 30 s were observed during 41% and 15% of sessions. In individual patients, the number of fractions with displacements > or =3 mm ranged from 3% to 87%; whereas the number of fractions with displacements > or =5 mm ranged from 0% to 56%.
CONCLUSION: The Calypso System is a clinically efficient and objective localization method for positioning prostate patients undergoing radiotherapy. Initial treatment setup can be performed rapidly, accurately, and objectively before radiation delivery. The extent and frequency of prostate motion during radiotherapy delivery can be easily monitored and used for motion management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17187940     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  149 in total

1.  Online monitoring and error detection of real-time tumor displacement prediction accuracy using control limits on respiratory surrogate statistics.

Authors:  Kathleen Malinowski; Thomas J McAvoy; Rohini George; Sonja Dieterich; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Feasibility of low-dose single-view 3D fiducial tracking concurrent with external beam delivery.

Authors:  Michael A Speidel; Brian P Wilfley; Annie Hsu; Dimitre Hristov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Reduction of dosimetric impact of intrafractional prostate motion during helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  V Prokic; H Geinitz; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  A review of image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  George T Y Chen; Gregory C Sharp; Shinichiro Mori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 5.  Technological advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mehee Choi; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  [Ultrasound motion tracking for radiation therapy].

Authors:  J Jenne; J Schwaab
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Optimizing monoscopic kV fluoro acquisition for prostate intrafraction motion evaluation.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Markerless tumor tracking using fast-kV switching dual-energy fluoroscopy on a benchtop system.

Authors:  Maksat Haytmyradov; Hassan Mostafavi; Adam Wang; Liangjia Zhu; Murat Surucu; Rakesh Patel; Arun Ganguly; Michelle Richmond; Roberto Cassetta; Matthew M Harkenrider; John C Roeske
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantifying the interplay effect in prostate IMRT delivery using a convolution-based method.

Authors:  Haisen S Li; Indrin J Chetty; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparative analysis of image guidance in two institutions for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Tomasz Piotrowski; Slav Yartsev; George Rodrigues; Tomasz Bajon
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.