BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess retrospectively secondary patient motion induced by 6D patient setup correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 104 patients, treated with Novalis, 6D setup correction prior to treatment was performed by ExacTrac5.0/NovalisBody in combination with the Robotic Tilt Module mounted underneath the Exact Couch top. This 6D correction might induce additional setup errors due to patient reaction against the rotations. To evaluate induced secondary motion, the 6D setup correction is verified and evaluated with respect to the tolerance limits. RESULTS: The majority of measured secondary motions are found within the tolerance limits. Detected secondary motions are mostly found in longitudinal shifts and lateral rotations, and mainly found in only 1 dimension during the same verification. The verifications indicate that the patient population can be divided into a group that hardly moves and a group that moves throughout all 6D setup corrections. The patient's behavior can be predicted by the evaluation of the first five fractions as none of the patients demonstrate a learning curve during the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: 6D setup correction does not induce secondary motion for the majority of the patients and can therefore be applied for all treatment indications.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess retrospectively secondary patient motion induced by 6D patient setup correction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 104 patients, treated with Novalis, 6D setup correction prior to treatment was performed by ExacTrac5.0/NovalisBody in combination with the Robotic Tilt Module mounted underneath the Exact Couch top. This 6D correction might induce additional setup errors due to patient reaction against the rotations. To evaluate induced secondary motion, the 6D setup correction is verified and evaluated with respect to the tolerance limits. RESULTS: The majority of measured secondary motions are found within the tolerance limits. Detected secondary motions are mostly found in longitudinal shifts and lateral rotations, and mainly found in only 1 dimension during the same verification. The verifications indicate that the patient population can be divided into a group that hardly moves and a group that moves throughout all 6D setup corrections. The patient's behavior can be predicted by the evaluation of the first five fractions as none of the patients demonstrate a learning curve during the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: 6D setup correction does not induce secondary motion for the majority of the patients and can therefore be applied for all treatment indications.
Authors: Nienke A Hoffmans-Holtzer; Daan Hoffmans; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Silvia Chiesa; Lorenzo Placidi; Luigi Azario; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Francesca Greco; Andrea Damiani; Giovanna Mantini; Vincenzo Frascino; Angelo Piermattei; Vincenzo Valentini; Mario Balducci Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 2.102