Literature DB >> 27377353

Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Slav Yartsev1,2, Glenn Bauman1,2.   

Abstract

We reviewed the literature on the use of margins in radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer, focusing on different options for image guidance (IG) and technical issues. The search in PubMed database was limited to include studies that involved external beam radiotherapy of the intact prostate. Post-prostatectomy studies, brachytherapy and particle therapy were excluded. Each article was characterized according to the IG strategy used: positioning on external marks using room lasers, bone anatomy and soft tissue match, usage of fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking and adapted delivery. A lack of uniformity in margin selection among institutions was evident from the review. In general, introduction of pre- and in-treatment IG was associated with smaller planning target volume (PTV) margins, but there was a lack of definitive experimental/clinical studies providing robust information on selection of exact PTV values. In addition, there is a lack of comparative research regarding the cost-benefit ratio of the different strategies: insertion of fiducial markers or electromagnetic transponders facilitates prostate gland localization but at a price of invasive procedure; frequent pre-treatment imaging increases patient in-room time, dose and labour; online plan adaptation should improve radiation delivery accuracy but requires fast and precise computation. Finally, optimal protocols for quality assurance procedures need to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27377353      PMCID: PMC5124838          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  130 in total

1.  Geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy.

Authors:  J M Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  [Interobserver variability study for daily cone beam computed tomography registration of prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy].

Authors:  N Zahra; C Monnet; E Bartha; G Bouilhol; C Boydev; M Courbis; M Le Grévellec; M Bosset; M Zouai; B Fleury; S Clippe
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.018

Review 3.  Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michel Ghilezan; Di Yan; Alvaro Martinez
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Lattanzi; S McNeeley; W Pinover; E Horwitz; I Das; T E Schultheiss; G E Hanks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  An in silico comparison between margin-based and probabilistic target-planning approaches in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Davide Fontanarosa; Hans Paul van der Laan; Marnix Witte; Georgy Shakirin; Erik Roelofs; Johannes A Langendijk; Philippe Lambin; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Planning target volume margins for prostate radiotherapy using daily electronic portal imaging and implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  David Skarsgard; Pat Cadman; Ali El-Gayed; Robert Pearcey; Patricia Tai; Nadeem Pervez; Jackson Wu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Radiotherapy with rectangular fields is associated with fewer clinical failures than conformal fields in the high-risk prostate cancer subgroup: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Wilma D Heemsbergen; Abrahim Al-Mamgani; Marnix G Witte; Marcel van Herk; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Interfraction prostate movement in bone alignment after rectal enema for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Young Eun Seo; Tae Hyo Kim; Ki Soo Lee; Won Yeol Cho; Hyung-Sik Lee; Won-Joo Hur; Youngmin Choi
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-01-15

9.  Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose-volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images.

Authors:  Yoshinori Hirose; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Tsuneyuki Tomita; Kenji Kitsuda; Takuya Notogawa; Katsuhito Miki; Kiyonao Nakamura; Takashi Ishigaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Accumulating daily-varied dose distributions of prostate radiation therapy with soft-tissue-based kV CT guidance.

Authors:  Andrew Godley; Ergun Ahunbay; Cheng Peng; X Allen Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Hamed Ghaffari; Mahmoud Navaser; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Soheila Refahi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Study of Asymmetric Margins in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Fuzzy Logic.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Patnaikuni; Sapan Mohan Saini; Rakesh Mohan Chandola; Pradeep Chandrakar; Vivek Chaudhary
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian Gleeson
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-03-19

4.  The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.

Authors:  Katsumi Hirose; Mariko Sato; Yoshiomi Hatayama; Hideo Kawaguchi; Fumio Komai; Makoto Sohma; Hideki Obara; Masashi Suzuki; Mitsuki Tanaka; Ichitaro Fujioka; Koji Ichise; Yoshihiro Takai; Masahiko Aoki
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Brian Ruiz; Yuanming Feng
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Investigation of the clinical inter-observer bias in prostate fiducial marker image registration between CT and MR images.

Authors:  Emilia Persson; Sevgi Emin; Jonas Scherman; Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson; Patrik Brynolfsson; Sofie Ceberg; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Lars E Olsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Impact of prostate focused alignment on planned pelvic lymph node dose.

Authors:  Joshua Kilian-Meneghin; Tianjun Ma; Lalith Kumaraswamy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A Noninvasive Body Setup Method for Radiotherapy by Using a Multimodal Image Fusion Technique.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Ying Chen; Yunxia Chen; Chenchen Wang; Jing Cai; Kaiyue Chu; Jianhua Jin; Yun Ge; Xiaolin Huang; Yue Guan; Weifeng Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Three-dimensional MRI evaluation of the effect of bladder volume on prostate translocation and distortion.

Authors:  Ziga Snoj; Andrew B Gill; Leonardo Rundo; Nikita Sushentsev; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Forecasting of the composite dose for organs at risk and solid targets with random movements during different image-guided scenarios of the photon radiation therapy. Solution for the Varian therapeutic line.

Authors:  Adam Ryczkowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.