Literature DB >> 22506784

Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow, Gail M Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

Our visual system is highly sensitive to regularities in the environment. Locations that were important in one's previous experience are often prioritized during search, even though observers may not be aware of the learning. In this study we characterized the guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning of a target's spatial probability, and examined the interaction between endogenous cuing and probability cuing. Participants searched for a target (T) among distractors (Ls). The target was more often located in one region of the screen than in others. We found that search reaction time (RT) was faster when the target appeared in the high-frequency region rather than the low-frequency regions. This difference increased when there were more items on the display, suggesting that probability cuing guides spatial attention. Additional data indicated that on their own, probability cuing and endogenous cuing (e.g., a central arrow that predicted a target's location) were similarly effective at guiding attention. However, when both cues were presented at once, probability cuing was largely eliminated. Thus, although both incidental learning and endogenous cuing can effectively guide attention, endogenous cuing takes precedence over incidental learning. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22506784      PMCID: PMC3431435          DOI: 10.1037/a0028022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

4.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-11
View more
  32 in total

1.  Cognitive Control Network Contributions to Memory-Guided Visual Attention.

Authors:  Maya L Rosen; Chantal E Stern; Samantha W Michalka; Kathryn J Devaney; David C Somers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum; Chelsey Herzig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The misrepresentation of spatial uncertainty in visual search: Single- versus joint-distribution probability cues.

Authors:  Bradley S Gibson; Joseph R Pauszek; Jamie M Trost; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Li Z Sha; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Category-specific learned attentional bias to object parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  "Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory.

Authors:  William X Q Ngiam; James A Brissenden; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-08

10.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.