Literature DB >> 17683230

Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Melina A Kunar1, Stephen Flusberg, Todd S Horowitz, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Contextual cuing experiments show that when displays are repeated, reaction times to find a target decrease over time even when observers are not aware of the repetition. It has been thought that the context of the display guides attention to the target. The authors tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of guidance in a standard search task with the effects of contextual cuing. First, in standard search, an improvement in guidance causes search slopes (derived from Reaction Time x Set Size functions) to decrease. In contrast, the authors found that search slopes in contextual cuing did not become more efficient over time (Experiment 1). Second, when guidance was optimal (e.g., in easy feature search), they still found a small but reliable contextual cuing effect (Experiments 2a and 2b), suggesting that other factors, such as response selection, contribute to the effect. Experiment 3 supported this hypothesis by showing that the contextual cuing effect disappeared when the authors added interference to the response selection process. Overall, the data suggest that the relationship between guidance and contextual cuing is weak and that response selection can account for part of the effect. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683230      PMCID: PMC2922990          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  26 in total

1.  Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Aude Oliva; Todd S Horowitz; Serena J Butcher; Aline Bompas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing--configuration or individual locations?

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Laura C Wagner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-04

4.  Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search.

Authors:  Alejandro Lleras; Adrian Von Mühlenen
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

5.  Preview search and contextual cuing.

Authors:  John P Hodsoll; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

8.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Perceiving real-world scenes.

Authors:  I Biederman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  High-capacity spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Joo-Hyun Song; Amanda Rigas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06
View more
  52 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context.

Authors:  Valeria Rausei; Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Sleep and rest facilitate implicit memory in a visual search task.

Authors:  S C Mednick; T Makovski; D J Cai; Y V Jiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

5.  Neural correlates of contextual cueing are modulated by explicit learning.

Authors:  Carmen E Westerberg; Brennan B Miller; Paul J Reber; Neal J Cohen; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Implicit learning of local context in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Anastasia Kourkoulou; Susan R Leekam; John M Findlay
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-02

7.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.