Literature DB >> 22428675

Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow, Gail M Rosenbaum, Chelsey Herzig.   

Abstract

Substantial research has focused on the allocation of spatial attention based on goals or perceptual salience. In everyday life, however, people also direct attention using their previous experience. Here we investigate the pace at which people incidentally learn to prioritize specific locations. Participants searched for a T among Ls in a visual search task. Unbeknownst to them, the target was more often located in one region of the screen than in other regions. An attentional bias toward the rich region developed over dozens of trials. However, the bias did not rapidly readjust to new contexts. It persisted for at least a week and for hundreds of trials after the target's position became evenly distributed. The persistence of the bias did not reflect a long window over which visual statistics were calculated. Long-term persistence differentiates incidentally learned attentional biases from the more flexible goal-driven attention. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22428675      PMCID: PMC3382032          DOI: 10.1037/a0027611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

5.  How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing.

Authors:  Justin A Jungé; Brian J Scholl; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2007

Review 6.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-11

10.  Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Jason T Arita
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-12-30
View more
  50 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.

Authors:  Rongqi Lin; Xinyu Li; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015

Review 5.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

8.  The misrepresentation of spatial uncertainty in visual search: Single- versus joint-distribution probability cues.

Authors:  Bradley S Gibson; Joseph R Pauszek; Jamie M Trost; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.