Literature DB >> 18372752

The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.

Melina A Kunar1, Stephen Flusberg, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the efficiency of visual search does not improve when participants search through the same unchanging display for hundreds of trials (repeated search), even though the participants have a clear memory of the search display. In this article, we ask two important questions. First, why do participants not use memory to help search the repeated display? Second, can context be introduced so that participants are able to guide their attention to the relevant repeated items? Experiments 1-4 show that participants choose not to use a memory strategy because, under these conditions, repeated memory search is actually less efficient than repeated visual search, even though the latter task is in itself relatively inefficient. However, when the visual search task is given context, so that only a subset of the items are ever pertinent, participants can learn to restrict their attention to the relevant stimuli (Experiments 5 and 6).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372752     DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.2.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen J Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008

3.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

5.  Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; George A Alvarez; Ruth Rosenholtz; Yoana I Kuzmova; Ashley M Sherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ; Karla K Evans; Michelle R Greene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.