Literature DB >> 16502846

Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Joy J Geng1, Marlene Behrmann.   

Abstract

We investigated the role of spatial probabilities in target location during participants' performance of a visual search task. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that spatial probabilities could serve as a powerful attentional bias that produced faster detection of targets in high-probability locations than of those in low- or random-probability locations. The effect could not be explained by repetition priming alone. Moreover, responses to targets in low-probability locations were slowed only when a distractor was present in the high-probability location. In Experiments 3-5, we compared the effects of spatial probability with an explicit endogenous cue and a salient exogenous cue. Facilitation due to spatial probability was independent of any benefit afforded by the explicit endogenous cue but interacted with the salient exogenous cue, such that the exogenous cue validity effect was compressed for targets in the high-probability location. Together, these results suggest that the spatial probabilities governing target location constitute a potent bias of visual processing and, as such, can be considered an attentional cue that differs from both typical explicit endogenous and salient exogenous cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16502846     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  74 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Liu; Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance.

Authors:  Nikos Gekas; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum; Chelsey Herzig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22

9.  Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Temporal consistency is currency in shifts of transient visual attention.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Katrín Ósk Eyjólfsdóttir; Anna Jónsdóttir; Guðmundur Arnkelsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.