Literature DB >> 25401460

Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Bo-Yeong Won1, Yuhong V Jiang1.   

Abstract

Recent empirical and theoretical work has depicted a close relationship between visual attention and visual working memory. For example, rehearsal in spatial working memory depends on spatial attention, whereas adding a secondary spatial working memory task impairs attentional deployment in visual search. These findings have led to the proposal that working memory is attention directed toward internal representations. Here, we show that the close relationship between these 2 constructs is limited to some but not all forms of spatial attention. In 5 experiments, participants held color arrays, dot locations, or a sequence of dots in working memory. During the memory retention interval, they performed a T-among-L visual search task. Crucially, the probable target location was cued either implicitly through location probability learning or explicitly with a central arrow or verbal instruction. Our results showed that whereas imposing a visual working memory load diminished the effectiveness of explicit cuing, it did not interfere with probability cuing. We conclude that spatial working memory shares similar mechanisms with explicit, goal-driven attention but is dissociated from implicitly learned attention. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25401460      PMCID: PMC4420710          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  49 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.

Authors:  Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Top-down visual activity underlying VSTM and preparatory attention.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Li Z Sha; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention.

Authors:  Emily L Twedell; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Jinyi Tao; Roger W Remington; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Habit-like attentional bias is unlike goal-driven attentional bias against spatial updating.

Authors:  Injae Hong; Min-Shik Kim
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Independence of implicitly guided attention from goal-driven oculomotor control.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Vanessa G Lee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 7.  Graded Memory: A Cognitive Category to Replace Spatial Sustained Attention and Working Memory
.

Authors:  Camilo D Libedinsky; Pedro F Fernandez
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25

8.  Location probability learning in 3-dimensional virtual search environments.

Authors:  Caitlin A Sisk; Victoria Interrante; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-24

9.  Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Tamara Giménez-Fernández; David Luque; David R Shanks; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-23

10.  Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.

Authors:  Ya Gao; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.