Literature DB >> 2971773

Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks.

J Miller1.   

Abstract

In visual search tasks, targets are detected more rapidly when they appear in locations that commonly contain a target than when they appear in locations that rarely contain a target. Five experiments were conducted to investigate two specific properties of this location probability effect: its dependence on spatial location versus relative position and its dependence on or independence of target identity. In Experiment 1 spatial location of a stimulus row was varied to determine whether high location probability facilitates target detection in a particular location in visual space or a particular relative position within the row. Both were facilitated to approximately the same extent. In Experiment 2 an inducing target occurred with high probability in one of four display locations, and a test target occurred with equal probability in all four locations. Both targets were found more quickly in the high-probability location than in the other locations, but the advantage associated with targets in the high-probability location was larger for the inducing target than for the test target. In Experiments 3-5 the correspondence between the components observed in Experiments 1 and 2 was examined. The overall pattern of results was compatible with a model in which the location probability effect is produced partly by an attentional spotlight, which facilitates processing of any stimulus appearing in a particular location in visual space, and partly by a network of position-specific letter detectors, which facilitates detection of a particular letter in a particular relative position within a display. Models with flexible scanning strategies were also considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2971773     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  37 in total

1.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

3.  Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.

Authors:  Rongqi Lin; Xinyu Li; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Object-based attention: strength of object representation and attentional guidance.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-01

5.  Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Liu; Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Trial type probability modulates the cost of antisaccades.

Authors:  Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Jia-Han Su; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.

Authors:  V Maljkovic; K Nakayama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

9.  Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance.

Authors:  Nikos Gekas; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Temporal consistency is currency in shifts of transient visual attention.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Katrín Ósk Eyjólfsdóttir; Anna Jónsdóttir; Guðmundur Arnkelsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.