| Literature DB >> 26105657 |
Yuhong V Jiang1, Li Z Sha2, Roger W Remington2,3.
Abstract
This study documented the relative strength of task goals, visual statistical learning, and monetary reward in guiding spatial attention. Using a difficult T-among-L search task, we cued spatial attention to one visual quadrant by (i) instructing people to prioritize it (goal-driven attention), (ii) placing the target frequently there (location probability learning), or (iii) associating that quadrant with greater monetary gain (reward-based attention). Results showed that successful goal-driven attention exerted the strongest influence on search RT. Incidental location probability learning yielded a smaller though still robust effect. Incidental reward learning produced negligible guidance for spatial attention. The 95 % confidence intervals of the three effects were largely nonoverlapping. To understand these results, we simulated the role of location repetition priming in probability cuing and reward learning. Repetition priming underestimated the strength of location probability cuing, suggesting that probability cuing involved long-term statistical learning of how to shift attention. Repetition priming provided a reasonable account for the negligible effect of reward on spatial attention. We propose a multiple-systems view of spatial attention that includes task goals, search habit, and priming as primary drivers of top-down attention.Entities:
Keywords: Goal-driven attention; Probability cuing; Repetition priming; Reward-based attention; Spatial attention; Visual search; Visual statistical learning
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26105657 PMCID: PMC4607612 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Atten Percept Psychophys ISSN: 1943-3921 Impact factor: 2.199