Literature DB >> 26105657

Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Li Z Sha2, Roger W Remington2,3.   

Abstract

This study documented the relative strength of task goals, visual statistical learning, and monetary reward in guiding spatial attention. Using a difficult T-among-L search task, we cued spatial attention to one visual quadrant by (i) instructing people to prioritize it (goal-driven attention), (ii) placing the target frequently there (location probability learning), or (iii) associating that quadrant with greater monetary gain (reward-based attention). Results showed that successful goal-driven attention exerted the strongest influence on search RT. Incidental location probability learning yielded a smaller though still robust effect. Incidental reward learning produced negligible guidance for spatial attention. The 95 % confidence intervals of the three effects were largely nonoverlapping. To understand these results, we simulated the role of location repetition priming in probability cuing and reward learning. Repetition priming underestimated the strength of location probability cuing, suggesting that probability cuing involved long-term statistical learning of how to shift attention. Repetition priming provided a reasonable account for the negligible effect of reward on spatial attention. We propose a multiple-systems view of spatial attention that includes task goals, search habit, and priming as primary drivers of top-down attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Goal-driven attention; Probability cuing; Repetition priming; Reward-based attention; Spatial attention; Visual search; Visual statistical learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26105657      PMCID: PMC4607612          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  49 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical and computational analysis of skill learning, repetition priming, and procedural memory.

Authors:  Prahlad Gupta; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 5.  Attention, reward, and information seeking.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Mary Hayhoe; Okihide Hikosaka; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 8.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices.

Authors:  E Camara; S Manohar; M Husain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Reward-priming of location in visual search.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Leonardo Chelazzi; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

3.  Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Jinyi Tao; Roger W Remington; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Attentional Orienting by Non-informative Cue Is Shaped via Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Sang A Cho; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15

7.  Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Tamara Giménez-Fernández; David Luque; David R Shanks; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-23

9.  Pupil size as a robust marker of attentional bias toward nicotine-related stimuli in smokers.

Authors:  Elvio Blini; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.