Literature DB >> 25113853

Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow, Bo-Yeong Won, Julia D Cistera, Gail M Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

Statistical regularities in our environment enhance perception and modulate the allocation of spatial attention. Surprisingly little is known about how learning-induced changes in spatial attention transfer across tasks. In this study, we investigated whether a spatial attentional bias learned in one task transfers to another. Most of the experiments began with a training phase in which a search target was more likely to be located in one quadrant of the screen than in the other quadrants. An attentional bias toward the high-probability quadrant developed during training (probability cuing). In a subsequent, testing phase, the target's location distribution became random. In addition, the training and testing phases were based on different tasks. Probability cuing did not transfer between visual search and a foraging-like task. However, it did transfer between various types of visual search tasks that differed in stimuli and difficulty. These data suggest that different visual search tasks share a common and transferrable learned attentional bias. However, this bias is not shared by high-level, decision-making tasks such as foraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25113853      PMCID: PMC4286444          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  62 in total

1.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Encoding multielement scenes: statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies.

Authors:  József Fiser; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

4.  Spatial context learning in visual search and change detection.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

5.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

6.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-12-31

9.  Sequences learned without awareness can orient attention during the perception of human activity.

Authors:  Khena M Swallow; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Acquisition of habitual visual attention and transfer to related tasks.

Authors:  Nikita A Salovich; Roger W Remington; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Modulation of spatial attention by goals, statistical learning, and monetary reward.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Li Z Sha; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Category-specific learned attentional bias to object parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Habit-like attentional bias is unlike goal-driven attentional bias against spatial updating.

Authors:  Injae Hong; Min-Shik Kim
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Ariel M Kershner; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.

Authors:  Ya Gao; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Simulated central vision loss does not impair implicit location probability learning when participants search through simple displays.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Vanessa G Lee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.157

10.  Idiosyncratic representation of peripersonal space depends on the success of one's own motor actions, but also the successful actions of others!

Authors:  Yann Coello; François Quesque; Maria-Francesca Gigliotti; Laurent Ott; Jean-Luc Bruyelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.