Literature DB >> 22352506

Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Xin Luo1, Monica Padilla, David M Landsberger.   

Abstract

This study investigated the integration of place- and temporal-pitch cues in pitch contour identification (PCI), in which cochlear implant (CI) users were asked to judge the overall pitch-change direction of stimuli. Falling and rising pitch contours were created either by continuously steering current between adjacent electrodes (place pitch), by continuously changing amplitude modulation (AM) frequency (temporal pitch), or both. The percentage of rising responses was recorded as a function of current steering or AM frequency change, with single or combined pitch cues. A significant correlation was found between subjects' sensitivity to current steering and AM frequency change. The integration of place- and temporal-pitch cues was most effective when the two cues were similarly discriminable in isolation. Adding the other (place or temporal) pitch cues shifted the temporal- or place-pitch psychometric functions horizontally without changing the slopes. PCI was significantly better with consistent place- and temporal-pitch cues than with inconsistent cues. PCI with single cues and integration of pitch cues were similar on different electrodes. The results suggest that CI users effectively integrate place- and temporal-pitch cues in relative pitch perception tasks. Current steering and AM frequency change should be coordinated to better transmit dynamic pitch information to CI users.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352506      PMCID: PMC3292606          DOI: 10.1121/1.3672708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joshua S Stohl; Chandra S Throckmorton; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

4.  Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Jian Yu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

10.  Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Demin Han; Bo Liu; Ning Zhou; Xueqing Chen; Ying Kong; Haihong Liu; Yan Zheng; Li Xu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

2.  The relationship between time and place coding with cochlear implants with long electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Jeremy Marozeau; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Griet Mertens; Andrea Kleine Punte; Paul Van De Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

Review 5.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Julia Stelmach; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Katrien Vermeire; Annes Claes; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.