Literature DB >> 18818548

Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Xin Luo1, Qian-Jie Fu, Chao-Gang Wei, Ke-Li Cao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Fundamental frequency (F0) information is important to Chinese tone and speech recognition. Cochlear implant (CI) speech processors typically provide limited F0 information via temporal envelopes delivered to stimulating electrodes. Previous studies have shown that English-speaking CI users' speech performance is correlated with amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs). The present study investigated whether Chinese-speaking CI users' speech performance (especially tone recognition) is correlated with temporal processing capabilities.
DESIGN: Chinese tone, vowel, consonant, and sentence recognition were measured in 10 native Mandarin-speaking CI users via clinically assigned speech processors. AMDTs were measured in the same subjects for 20- and 100-Hz amplitude modulated (AM) stimuli presented to a middle electrode at five stimulation levels that spanned the dynamic range. To further investigate the CI users' sensitivity to temporal envelope cues, AM frequency discrimination thresholds (AMFDTs) were measured for two standard AM frequencies (50 and 100 Hz), presented to the same middle electrode at 30% and 70% dynamic range with a fixed modulation depth (50%).
RESULTS: Results showed that AMDTs significantly improved with increasing stimulation level and that individual subjects exhibited markedly different AMDT functions. AMFDTs also improved with increasing stimulation level and were better with the 100-Hz standard AM frequency than with the 50-Hz standard AM frequency. Statistical analyses revealed that both mean AMDTs (averaged for 20- or 100-Hz AM across all stimulation levels) and mean AMFDTs (averaged for the 50-Hz standard AM frequency across both stimulation levels) were significantly correlated with tone, consonant, and sentence recognition scores, but not with vowel recognition scores. Mean AMDTs were also significantly correlated with mean AMFDTs.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results, obtained from a limited number of subjects, demonstrate the importance of temporal processing to CI speech recognition. The results further suggest that CI users' Chinese tone and speech recognition may be improved by enhancing temporal envelope cues delivered by speech processing algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18818548      PMCID: PMC2704892          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181888f61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  38 in total

1.  Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.

Authors:  G S Donaldson; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  P A Busby; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  49 in total

1.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of stimulus duration on amplitude modulation processing with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.