Literature DB >> 18247906

Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.

Joshua S Stohl1, Chandra S Throckmorton, Leslie M Collins.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant subjects continue to experience difficulty understanding speech in noise and performing pitch-based musical tasks. Acoustic model studies have suggested that transmitting additional fine structure via multiple stimulation rates is a potential mechanism for addressing these issues [Nie et al., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52, 64-73 (2005); Throckmorton et al., Hear. Res. 218, 30-42 (2006)]; however, results from preliminary cochlear implant studies have been less compelling. Multirate speech processing algorithms previously assumed a place-dependent pitch structure in that a basal electrode would always elicit a higher pitch percept than an apical electrode, independent of stimulation rate. Some subjective evidence contradicts this assumption [H. J. McDermott and C. M. McKay, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1622-1630 (1997); R. V. Shannon, Hear. Res. 11, 157-189 (1983)]. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that the introduction of multiple rates may invalidate the tonotopic pitch structure resulting from place-pitch alone. The SPEAR3 developmental speech processor was used to collect psychophysical data from five cochlear implant users to assess the tonotopic structure for stimuli presented at two rates on all active electrodes. Pitch ranking data indicated many cases where pitch percepts overlapped across electrodes and rates. Thus, the results from this study suggest that pitch-based tuning across rate and electrode may be necessary to optimize performance of a multirate sound processing strategy in cochlear implant subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247906     DOI: 10.1121/1.2821980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Katrien Vermeire; Annes Claes; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Computer-based musical interval training program for Cochlear implant users and listeners with no known hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Rebekah Subrahmanyam Bissmeyer; Jacqueline Rose Ortiz; Helena Gan; Raymond Lee Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.