Literature DB >> 25449009

Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Robert V Shannon1.   

Abstract

The House Ear Institute (HEI) had a long and distinguished history of auditory implant innovation and development. Early clinical innovations include being one of the first cochlear implant (CI) centers, being the first center to implant a child with a cochlear implant in the US, developing the auditory brainstem implant, and developing multiple surgical approaches and tools for Otology. This paper reviews the second stage of auditory implant research at House - in-depth basic research on perceptual capabilities and signal processing for both cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants. Psychophysical studies characterized the loudness and temporal perceptual properties of electrical stimulation as a function of electrical parameters. Speech studies with the noise-band vocoder showed that only four bands of tonotopically arrayed information were sufficient for speech recognition, and that most implant users were receiving the equivalent of 8-10 bands of information. The noise-band vocoder allowed us to evaluate the effects of the manipulation of the number of bands, the alignment of the bands with the original tonotopic map, and distortions in the tonotopic mapping, including holes in the neural representation. Stimulation pulse rate was shown to have only a small effect on speech recognition. Electric fields were manipulated in position and sharpness, showing the potential benefit of improved tonotopic selectivity. Auditory training shows great promise for improving speech recognition for all patients. And the Auditory Brainstem Implant was developed and improved and its application expanded to new populations. Overall, the last 25 years of research at HEI helped increase the basic scientific understanding of electrical stimulation of hearing and contributed to the improved outcomes for patients with the CI and ABI devices. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25449009      PMCID: PMC4380593          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  126 in total

1.  Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.

Authors:  M Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cochlear nucleus implants.

Authors:  W E Hitselberger; W F House; B J Edgerton; S Whitaker
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; M Zerbi
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Hung-Pin Wu; Chuan-Jen Hsu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013
View more
  8 in total

1.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effect of anesthesia on evoked auditory responses in pediatric auditory brainstem implant surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Wong; Ruwan Kiringoda; Vivek V Kanumuri; Samuel R Barber; Kevin Franck; Nita Sahani; M Christian Brown; Barbara S Herrmann; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Written language skills in children with auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Hilal Burcu Ozkan; Filiz Aslan; Esra Yucel; Gonca Sennaroglu; Levent Sennaroglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Early Communication Development of Children with Auditory Brainstem Implants.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Amy S Martinez; Laurel M Fisher; Margaret E Winter; Jamie L Glater; Debra K Schrader; Janice Loggins; Eric P Wilkinson
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2018-07-01

Review 5.  Recent surgical options for vestibular vertigo.

Authors:  Stefan Volkenstein; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Use of Research Interfaces for Psychophysical Studies With Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  The Importance of Early Genetic Diagnostics of Hearing Loss in Children.

Authors:  Nina Božanić Urbančič; Saba Battelino; Tine Tesovnik; Katarina Trebušak Podkrajšek
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.