Literature DB >> 18974203

Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Pitch is important for speech and music perception, and may also play a crucial role in our ability to segregate sounds that arrive from different sources. This article reviews some basic aspects of pitch coding in the normal auditory system and explores the implications for pitch perception in people with hearing impairments and cochlear implants. Data from normal-hearing listeners suggest that the low-frequency, low-numbered harmonics within complex tones are of prime importance in pitch perception and in the perceptual segregation of competing sounds. The poorer frequency selectivity experienced by many hearing-impaired listeners leads to less access to individual harmonics, and the coding schemes currently employed in cochlear implants provide little or no representation of individual harmonics. These deficits in the coding of harmonic sounds may underlie some of the difficulties experienced by people with hearing loss and cochlear implants, and may point to future areas where sound representation in auditory prostheses could be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974203      PMCID: PMC2901529          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808325881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  88 in total

1.  Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C L Mackersie; T L Prida; D Stiles
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of context on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Olivia L Carter; Suh-Kyung Lee; Erin E Hannon; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  Y C Tong; P J Blamey; R C Dowell; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  64 in total

1.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The biophysical origin of traveling-wave dispersion in the cochlea.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Ding-Jun Zha; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

6.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

7.  Individual Differences in Mothers' Spontaneous Infant-Directed Speech Predict Language Attainment in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Laura Dilley; Matthew Lehet; Elizabeth A Wieland; Meisam K Arjmandi; Maria Kondaurova; Yuanyuan Wang; Jessa Reed; Mario Svirsky; Derek Houston; Tonya Bergeson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Nicole Duncan; Patricia A Roush; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.