Literature DB >> 25234918

Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.

David M Landsberger1, Griet Mertens2, Andrea Kleine Punte2, Paul Van De Heyning2.   

Abstract

Long (31.5 mm) electrode arrays are inserted deeper into the cochlea than the typical 1.25 turn insertion. With these electrode arrays, the apical electrodes are closer to (and possibly extend past) the end of the spiral ganglion. Using multi-dimensional scaling with patients implanted with a 31.5 mm electrode array, the perceptual space between electrodes was measured. The results suggest that deeper insertion increases the range of place pitches, but the perceptual differences between adjacent electrodes become smaller in the apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234918      PMCID: PMC3985910          DOI: 10.1121/1.4862875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.

Authors:  Uwe Baumann; Andrea Nobbe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Mathieu Gani; Gregory Valentini; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Colette Boëx
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-11

4.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal's canal.

Authors:  A Kawano; H L Seldon; G M Clark
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.

Authors:  Jafar Hamzavi; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  Y C Tong; P J Blamey; R C Dowell; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J Otte; H F Schunknecht; A G Kerr
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  The spiral ganglion and the innervation of the human organ of Corti.

Authors:  H Spoendlin; A Schrott
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  16 in total

1.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The relationship between time and place coding with cochlear implants with long electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Jeremy Marozeau; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Maja Svrakic; J Thomas Roland; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Effects of Degrees of Degeneration on the Electrical Excitation of Human Spiral Ganglion Neurons Based on a High-Resolution Computer Model.

Authors:  Albert M Croner; Amirreza Heshmat; Anneliese Schrott-Fischer; Rudolf Glueckert; Werner Hemmert; Siwei Bai
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.152

7.  Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Katrien Vermeire; Annes Claes; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Incidence of Complete Insertion in Cochlear Implant Recipients of Long Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.591

9.  Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

Authors:  John E Iyaniwura; Mai Elfarnawany; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.