Literature DB >> 27939418

Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Waldo Nogueira1, Leonid M Litvak2, David M Landsberger3, Andreas Büchner4.   

Abstract

Reducing power consumption is important for the development of smaller cochlear implant (CI) speech processors. Simultaneous electrode stimulation may improve power efficiency by minimizing the required current applied to a given electrode. Simultaneous in-phase stimulation on adjacent electrodes (i.e. virtual channels) can be used to elicit pitch percepts intermediate to the ones provided by each of the physical electrodes in isolation. Virtual channels are typically implemented in monopolar stimulation mode, producing broad excitation patterns. Focused stimulation may reduce the excitation patterns, but is inefficient in terms of power consumption. To create a more power efficient virtual channel, we developed the Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channel (DC-VC) using four adjacent electrodes. The two central electrodes are current steered using the coefficient α (0<α<1 ) whereas the two flanking electrodes are used to focus/unfocus the stimulation with the coefficient σ (-1<σ<1). With increasing values of σ, power can be saved at the potential expense of generating broader electric fields. Additionally, reshaping the electric fields might also alter place pitch coding. The goal of the present study is to investigate the tradeoff between place pitch encoding and power savings using simultaneous electrode stimulation in the DC-VC configuration. A computational model and psychophysical experiments in CI users have been used for that purpose. Results from 10 adult Advanced Bionics CI users have been collected. Results show that the required current to produce comfortable levels is significantly reduced with increasing σ as predicted by the computational model. Moreover, no significant differences in the estimated number of discriminable steps were detected for the different values of σ. From these results, we conclude that DC-VCs can reduce power consumption without decreasing the number of discriminable place pitch steps.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Current steering; Finite element model; Focused stimulation; Loudness; Pitch; Strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939418      PMCID: PMC5421637          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  46 in total

1.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J J Briaire; J H Frijns
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing.

Authors:  David Landsberger; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Timothy A Holden; Gary H McClelland; Wendy S Parkinson; Clough Shelton; David C Kelsall; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-30

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

9.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.

Authors:  Johan H M Frijns; Randy K Kalkman; Filiep J Vanpoucke; Jorien Snel Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A phenomenological computational model of the evoked action potential fitted to human cochlear implant responses.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos-de-Miguel; José M Escobar; David Greiner; Domingo Benítez; Eduardo Rodríguez; Albert Oliver; Marcos Hernández; Ángel Ramos-Macías
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Combining current focusing and steering in a cochlear implant processing strategy.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu; Kathryn Pulling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Multichannel optrodes for photonic stimulation.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Nan Xia; Michelle Lim; Xiaodong Tan; Minh Ha Tran; Erin Boulger; Fei Peng; Hunter Young; Christoph Rau; Alexander Rack; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.593

5.  A Dynamically Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategy Can Improve Vowel Identification in Noise.

Authors:  Julie G Arenberg; Wendy S Parkinson; Leonid Litvak; Chen Chen; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.