Literature DB >> 29313147

Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Yael Zaltz1,2, Raymond L Goldsworthy3, Liat Kishon-Rabin4, Laurie S Eisenberg3.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users find it extremely difficult to discriminate between talkers, which may partially explain why they struggle to understand speech in a multi-talker environment. Recent studies, based on findings with postlingually deafened CI users, suggest that these difficulties may stem from their limited use of vocal-tract length (VTL) cues due to the degraded spectral resolution transmitted by the CI device. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of adult CI users who had no prior acoustic experience, i.e., prelingually deafened adults, to discriminate between resynthesized "talkers" based on either fundamental frequency (F0) cues, VTL cues, or both. Performance was compared to individuals with normal hearing (NH), listening either to degraded stimuli, using a noise-excited channel vocoder, or non-degraded stimuli. Results show that (a) age of implantation was associated with VTL but not F0 cues in discriminating between talkers, with improved discrimination for those subjects who were implanted at earlier age; (b) there was a positive relationship for the CI users between VTL discrimination and speech recognition score in quiet and in noise, but not with frequency discrimination or cognitive abilities; (c) early-implanted CI users showed similar voice discrimination ability as the NH adults who listened to vocoded stimuli. These data support the notion that voice discrimination is limited by the speech processing of the CI device. However, they also suggest that early implantation may facilitate sensory-driven tonotopicity and/or improve higher-order auditory functions, enabling better perception of VTL spectral cues for voice discrimination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VTL; cochlear implant; early implantation; talker discrimination; vocal-tract length; voice discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29313147      PMCID: PMC5878152          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0653-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  82 in total

1.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions.

Authors:  Cheryl F Rogers; Eric W Healy; Allen A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

Review 5.  Auditory critical periods: a review from system's perspective.

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score.

Authors:  A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; J Tillein; S Heid; R Klinke
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Demin Han; Bo Liu; Ning Zhou; Xueqing Chen; Ying Kong; Haihong Liu; Yan Zheng; Li Xu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Laurie S Eisenberg; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Implicit Processing of Pitch in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Barbara Tillmann; Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat; Etienne Gaudrain; Idrick Akhoun; Charles Delbé; Eric Truy; Lionel Collet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-11

3.  Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

4.  Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Yossi Bugannim; Doreen Zechoval; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.