Literature DB >> 18003871

Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Qian-Jie Fu, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the ability of normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users to recognize vocal emotions. Sentences were produced by 1 male and 1 female talker according to 5 target emotions: angry, anxious, happy, sad, and neutral. Overall amplitude differences between the stimuli were either preserved or normalized. In experiment 1, vocal emotion recognition was measured in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners; cochlear implant subjects were tested using their clinically assigned processors. When overall amplitude cues were preserved, normal-hearing listeners achieved near-perfect performance, whereas listeners with cochlear implant recognized less than half of the target emotions. Removing the overall amplitude cues significantly worsened mean normal-hearing and cochlear implant performance. In experiment 2, vocal emotion recognition was measured in listeners with cochlear implant as a function of the number of channels (from 1 to 8) and envelope filter cutoff frequency (50 vs 400 Hz) in experimental speech processors. In experiment 3, vocal emotion recognition was measured in normal-hearing listeners as a function of the number of channels (from 1 to 16) and envelope filter cutoff frequency (50 vs 500 Hz) in acoustic cochlear implant simulations. Results from experiments 2 and 3 showed that both cochlear implant and normal-hearing performance significantly improved as the number of channels or the envelope filter cutoff frequency was increased. The results suggest that spectral, temporal, and overall amplitude cues each contribute to vocal emotion recognition. The poorer cochlear implant performance is most likely attributable to the lack of salient pitch cues and the limited functional spectral resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003871      PMCID: PMC4111530          DOI: 10.1177/1084713807305301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  20 in total

1.  Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion?

Authors:  L J Trainor; C M Austin; R N Desjardins
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech.

Authors:  Julio Gonzalez; Juan C Oliver
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates.

Authors:  C E Williams; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion.

Authors:  I R Murray; J L Arnott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory, visual and auditory-visual identification of emotions by hearing and hearing-impaired adolescents.

Authors:  T Most; A Weisel; A Zaychik
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1993-08
View more
  62 in total

1.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Encoding pitch contours using current steering.

Authors:  Xin Luo; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Intelligibility of naturally produced and synthesized Mandarin speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Yue Gong; Biao Chen; Yongxin Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Authors:  Daan J van de Velde; Niels O Schiller; Vincent J van Heuven; Claartje C Levelt; Joost van Ginkel; Mieke Beers; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.