Literature DB >> 30377852

Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Xin Luo1, Samara Soslowsky2, Kathryn R Pulling2.   

Abstract

Despite their mutually exclusive definitions, pitch and timbre perception interact with each other in normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Cochlear implant (CI) users have worse than normal pitch and timbre perception. However, the pitch-timbre interaction with CIs is not well understood. This study tested the interaction between pitch and sharpness (an aspect of timbre) perception related to the fundamental frequency (F0) and spectral slope of harmonic complex tones, respectively, in both NH listeners and CI users. In experiment 1, the F0 (and spectral slope) difference limens (DLs) were measured with a fixed spectral slope (and F0) and 20-dB amplitude roving. Then, the F0 and spectral slope were varied congruently or incongruently by the same multiple of individual DLs to assess the pitch and sharpness ranking sensitivity. Both NH and CI subjects had significantly higher pitch and sharpness ranking sensitivity with congruent than with incongruent F0 and spectral slope variations, and showed a similar symmetric interaction between pitch and timbre perception. In experiment 2, CI users' melodic contour identification (MCI) was tested in three spectral slope (no, congruent, and incongruent spectral slope variations by the same multiple of individual DLs as the F0 variations) and two amplitude conditions (0- and 20-dB amplitude roving). When there was no amplitude roving, the MCI scores were significantly higher with congruent than with no, and in turn than with incongruent spectral slope variations. The 20-dB amplitude roving significantly reduced the overall MCI scores and the effect of spectral slope variations. These results reflected a confusion between higher (or lower) pitch and sharper (or duller) timbre and offered important implications for understanding and enhancing pitch and timbre perception with CIs.

Keywords:  cochlear implant; fundamental frequency; pitch; spectral slope; timbre

Year:  2018        PMID: 30377852      PMCID: PMC6364262          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-00701-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  31 in total

1.  Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; George Woodworth; Maureen A Mehr; John Knutson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Christopher Turner; Jacob Oleson; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce Gantz; Rebecca Froman; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Independence and separability in the perception of complex nonspeech sounds.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; James T Townsend; Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Alexia Delpierre
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  4 in total

1.  Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre to the Perception of Vocal Emotions in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Celina I von Eiff; Verena G Skuk; Romi Zäske; Christine Nussbaum; Sascha Frühholz; Ute Feuer; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Vibrotactile Stimulation Based on the Fundamental Frequency Can Improve Melodic Contour Identification of Normal-Hearing Listeners With a 4-Channel Cochlear Implant Simulation.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Lauren Hayes
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  The Impact of Pitch and Timbre Cues on Auditory Grouping and Stream Segregation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Jillian C Zuwala; Caitlin M Salvagno; Grace A Tilbrook
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Computer-based musical interval training program for Cochlear implant users and listeners with no known hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Rebekah Subrahmanyam Bissmeyer; Jacqueline Rose Ortiz; Helena Gan; Raymond Lee Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.152

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.