Literature DB >> 22326590

Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.

Michelle L Hughes1, Erin E Castioni, Jenny L Goehring, Jacquelyn L Baudhuin.   

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to characterize the variability in auditory-nerve temporal response patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) within and across a relatively large group of cochlear-implant recipients. ECAPs were recorded in response to each of 21 pulses in a pulse train for five rates (900, 1200, 1800, 2400, and 3500 pps) and three cochlear regions (basal, middle, and apical). An alternating amplitude pattern was typically observed across the pulse train for slower rates, reflecting refractory properties of individual nerve fibers. For faster rates, the alternation ceased and overall amplitudes were substantially lower relative to the first pulse in the train, reflecting cross-fiber desynchronization. The following specific parameters were examined: (1) the rate at which the alternating pattern ceased (termed stochastic rate), (2) the alternation depth and the rate at which the maximum alternation occurred, and (3) the average normalized ECAP amplitude across the pulse train (measure of overall adaptation/desynchronization). Data from 29 ears showed that stochastic rates for the group spanned the entire range of rates tested. The majority of subjects (79%) had different stochastic rates across the three cochlear regions. The stochastic rate occurred most frequently at 2400 pps for basal and middle electrodes, and at 3500 pps for apical electrodes. Stimulus level was significantly correlated with stochastic rate, where higher levels yielded faster stochastic rates. The maximum alternation depth averaged 19% of the amplitude for the first pulse. Maximum alternation occurred most often at 1800 pps for basal and apical electrodes, and at 1200 pps for middle electrodes. These differences suggest some independence between alternation depth and stochastic rate. Finally, the overall amount of adaptation or desynchronization ranged from 63% (for 900 pps) to 23% (for 3500 pps) of the amplitude for the first pulse. Differences in temporal response properties across the cochlea within subjects may have implications for developing new speech-processing strategies that employ varied rates across the array.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326590      PMCID: PMC3299843          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  An analysis of the impact of auditory-nerve adaptation on behavioral measures of temporal integration in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

3.  Effects of neural refractoriness on spatio-temporal variability in spike initiations with Electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mino; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bas van Dijk; Andrew M Botros; Rolf-Dieter Battmer; Klaus Begall; Norbert Dillier; Matthias Hey; Wai Kong Lai; Thomas Lenarz; Roland Laszig; Andre Morsnowski; Joachim Müller-Deile; Colleen Psarros; Jon Shallop; Benno Weber; Thomas Wesarg; Andrzej Zarowski; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Brenda D Gotter; Michael J Strube; Chris A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

7.  Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Ning Hu; Fawen Zhang; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-17

8.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Relation of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to behavioral T- and C-levels in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Beth A Holstad; Valerie G Sonneveldt; Beverly T Fears; Lisa S Davidson; Roxanne J Aaron; Marie Richter; Maggie Matusofsky; Christine A Brenner; Michael J Strube; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  24 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17

9.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bournique; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.