Literature DB >> 27794318

Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Michelle L Hughes1, Jenny L Goehring1, Jacquelyn L Baudhuin1, Kendra K Schmid2.   

Abstract

This study examined channel interactions using interleaved pulse trains to assess masking and potential facilitative effects in cochlear-implant recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. Psychophysical thresholds were measured for two adjacent mid-array electrodes; one served as the masker and the other as the probe. Two rates representative of those found in present-day strategies were tested: 1700 and 3400 pulses per second per channel. Four masker levels ranging from sub-threshold to loud-but-comfortable were tested. It was hypothesized that low-level maskers would produce facilitative effects, shifting to masking effects at high levels, and that faster rates would yield smaller masking effects due to greater stochastic neural firing patterns. Twenty-nine ears with Cochlear or Advanced Bionics devices were tested. High-level maskers produced more masking than low-level maskers, as expected. Facilitation was not observed for sub-threshold or threshold-level maskers in most cases. High masker levels yielded reduced probe thresholds for two Advanced Bionics subjects. This was partly eliminated with a longer temporal offset between each masker-probe pulse pair, as was used with Cochlear subjects. These findings support the use of temporal gaps between stimulation of subsequent electrodes to reduce channel interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794318      PMCID: PMC6910005          DOI: 10.1121/1.4963903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multielectrode-implant listeners.

Authors:  M Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.

Authors:  C M McKay; M D Remine; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

8.  Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.

Authors:  H H Lim; Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.