Literature DB >> 17562109

Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Fawen Zhang1, Charles A Miller, Barbara K Robinson, Paul J Abbas, Ning Hu.   

Abstract

We undertook a systematic evaluation of spike rates and spike amplitudes of auditory nerve fiber (ANF) responses to trains of electric current pulses. Measures were obtained from acutely deafened cats to examine time-related changes free from the effects of hair-cell and synaptic adaptation. Such data relate to adaptation that likely occurs in ANFs of cochlear-implant users. A major goal was to determine and compare rate adaptation observed at different pulse rates (primarily 250, 1000, and 5000 pulse/s) and describe them using decaying exponential models similar to those used in acoustic studies. Rate-vs.-time functions were best described by two-exponent models and produced time constants similar to (although slightly greater than) the "rapid" and "short-term" components described in acoustic studies. There was little dependence of these time constants on onset spike rate, but pulse-rate effects were noted. Spike amplitude changes followed a time course different from that of rate adaptation consistent with a process related to ANF interspike intervals. The fact that two time constants governed rate adaptation in electrically stimulated and deafened fibers suggests that future computational models of adaptation should not only include hair cell and synapse components, but also components determined by fiber membrane characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562109      PMCID: PMC2538432          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0086-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  39 in total

1.  Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve.

Authors:  T C Chimento; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons.

Authors:  E M Relkin; J R Doucet
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor.

Authors:  R Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  L A Westerman; R L Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron.

Authors:  J Colombo; C W Parkins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  C W Parkins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes.

Authors:  C W Parkins; J Colombo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  39 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

3.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

6.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.