Literature DB >> 23073669

Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Colette M McKay1, Hubert H Lim, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

Central auditory processing in humans was investigated by comparing the perceptual effects of temporal parameters of electrical stimulation in auditory midbrain implant (AMI) and cochlear implant (CI) users. Four experiments were conducted to measure the following: effect of interpulse intervals on detection thresholds and loudness; temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs); effect of duration on detection thresholds; and forward masking decay. The CI data were consistent with a phenomenological model that based detection or loudness decisions on the output of a sliding temporal integration window, the input to which was the hypothetical auditory nerve response to each stimulus pulse. To predict the AMI data, the model required changes to both the neural response input (i.e., midbrain activity to AMI stimuli, compared to auditory nerve activity to CI stimuli) and the shape of the integration window. AMI data were consistent with a neural response that decreased more steeply compared to CI stimulation as the pulse rate increased or interpulse interval decreased. For one AMI subject, the data were consistent with a significant adaptation of the neural response for rates above 200 Hz. The AMI model required an integration window that was significantly wider (i.e., decreased temporal resolution) than that for CI data, the latter being well fit using the same integration window shape as derived from normal-hearing data. These models provide a useful way to conceptualize how stimulation of central auditory structures differs from stimulation of the auditory nerve and to better understand why AMI users have difficulty processing temporal cues important for speech understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073669      PMCID: PMC3540271          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0354-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  53 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation in electric hearing.

Authors:  G S Donaldson; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Rate-versus-level functions of primary auditory nerve fibres: evidence for square law behaviour of all fibre categories in the guinea pig.

Authors:  M Müller; D Robertson; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The shape of the ear's temporal window.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; C J Plack; A K Biswas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Marc S Schwartz; Steven R Otto; Robert V Shannon; William E Hitselberger; Derald E Brackmann
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Electrical stimulation of the midbrain for hearing restoration: insight into the functional organization of the human central auditory system.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz; Gert Joseph; Rolf-Dieter Battmer; Amir Samii; Madjid Samii; James F Patrick; Minoo Lenarz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in cochlear implantees using a method that limits overall loudness cues.

Authors:  Matthew Fraser; Colette M McKay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  18 in total

1.  Neural integration and enhancement from the inferior colliculus up to different layers of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Straka; Dillon Schendel; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

4.  Intensity Discrimination and Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Natalie Rickard; Katherine Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-17

5.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

6.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Can ECAP measures be used for totally objective programming of cochlear implants?

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Kirpa Chandan; Idrick Akhoun; Catherine Siciliano; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.