Literature DB >> 25093283

The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Michelle L Hughes1, Jacquelyn L Baudhuin2, Jenny L Goehring2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine auditory-nerve temporal response properties and their relation to psychophysical threshold for electrical pulse trains of varying rates ("rate integration"). The primary hypothesis was that better rate integration (steeper slope) would be correlated with smaller decrements in ECAP amplitude as a function of stimulation rate (shallower slope of the amplitude-rate function), reflecting a larger percentage of the neural population contributing more synchronously to each pulse in the train. Data were obtained for 26 ears in 23 cochlear-implant recipients. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitudes were measured in response to each of 21 pulses in a pulse train for the following rates: 900, 1200, 1800, 2400, and 3500 pps. Psychophysical thresholds were obtained using a 3-interval, forced-choice adaptive procedure for 300-ms pulse trains of the same rates as used for the ECAP measures, which formed the rate-integration function. For each electrode, the slope of the psychophysical rate-integration function was compared to the following ECAP measures: (1) slope of the function comparing average normalized ECAP amplitude across pulses versus stimulation rate ("adaptation"), (2) the rate that produced the maximum alternation depth across the pulse train, and (3) rate at which the alternating pattern ceased (stochastic rate). Results showed no significant relations between the slope of the rate-integration function and any of the ECAP measures when data were collapsed across subjects. However, group data showed that both threshold and average ECAP amplitude decreased with increased stimulus rate, and within-subject analyses showed significant positive correlations between psychophysical thresholds and mean ECAP response amplitudes across the pulse train. These data suggest that ECAP temporal response patterns are complex and further study is required to better understand the relative contributions of adaptation, desynchronization, and firing probabilities of individual neurons that contribute to the aggregate ECAP response.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25093283      PMCID: PMC4194221          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings.

Authors:  A J Matsuoka; P J Abbas; J T Rubinstein; C A Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L A Cartee; C van den Honert; C C Finley; R L Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Marilyn E Demorest
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; C J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Dora Murphy; Melissa Boian; Michael Scott; Robert Keith; Jing Xiang; Paul Abbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Damir Kovačić; Chris J James
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-02

7.  Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; William J Riggs; Brittney L Carter; Ruili Xie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Craig Buchman; Laurie Eisenberg; Lillian Henderson; Shuman He; Jill Firszt; Howard Francis; Camille Dunn; Doug Sladen; Susan Arndt; Bradford May; Daniel Zeitler; John K Niparko; Susan Emmett; Debara Tucci; Joseph Chen; Amy McConkey Robbins; Ernest Schwefler; Ann Geers; Amy Lederberg; Heather Hayes; Michelle Hughes; Julie Bierer; Erin Schafer; Donna Sorkin; Linda Kozma-Spytek; Tina Childress
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-09-16

Review 10.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.