Literature DB >> 18204987

Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Charles A Miller1, Ning Hu, Fawen Zhang, Barbara K Robinson, Paul J Abbas.   

Abstract

Most auditory prostheses use modulated electric pulse trains to excite the auditory nerve. There are, however, scant data regarding the effects of pulse trains on auditory nerve fiber (ANF) responses across the duration of such stimuli. We examined how temporal ANF properties changed with level and pulse rate across 300-ms pulse trains. Four measures were examined: (1) first-spike latency, (2) interspike interval (ISI), (3) vector strength (VS), and (4) Fano factor (FF, an index of the temporal variability of responsiveness). Data were obtained using 250-, 1,000-, and 5,000-pulse/s stimuli. First-spike latency decreased with increasing spike rate, with relatively small decrements observed for 5,000-pulse/s trains, presumably reflecting integration. ISIs to low-rate (250 pulse/s) trains were strongly locked to the stimuli, whereas ISIs evoked with 5,000-pulse/s trains were dominated by refractory and adaptation effects. Across time, VS decreased for low-rate trains but not for 5,000-pulse/s stimuli. At relatively high spike rates (>200 spike/s), VS values for 5,000-pulse/s trains were lower than those obtained with 250-pulse/s stimuli (even after accounting for the smaller periods of the 5,000-pulse/s stimuli), indicating a desynchronizing effect of high-rate stimuli. FF measures also indicated a desynchronizing effect of high-rate trains. Across a wide range of response rates, FF underwent relatively fast increases (i.e., within 100 ms) for 5,000-pulse/s stimuli. With a few exceptions, ISI, VS, and FF measures approached asymptotic values within the 300-ms duration of the low- and high-rate trains. These findings may have implications for designs of cochlear implant stimulus protocols, understanding electrically evoked compound action potentials, and interpretation of neural measures obtained at central nuclei, which depend on understanding the output of the auditory nerve.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204987      PMCID: PMC2536806          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0108-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L A Cartee; C van den Honert; C C Finley; R L Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve.

Authors:  H Spoendlin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1975 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 3.  Anatomical differences in the peripheral auditory system of mammals and man. A mini review.

Authors:  Heidi Felix
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002

4.  Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; B K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

5.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

6.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; P B Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Pulse-number distribution for the neural spike train in the cat's auditory nerve.

Authors:  M C Teich; S M Khanna
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.

Authors:  L Litvak; B Delgutte; D Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Morphometric analysis of normal human spiral ganglion cells.

Authors:  J B Nadol; B J Burgess; C Reisser
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mino; Jay T Rubinstein; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  31 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

3.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Auditory sensitivity may require dynamically unstable spike generators: evidence from a model of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; H Steven Colburn; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; John A White; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24

8.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

9.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.