Literature DB >> 17609616

Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.

Bas van Dijk1, Andrew M Botros, Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Klaus Begall, Norbert Dillier, Matthias Hey, Wai Kong Lai, Thomas Lenarz, Roland Laszig, Andre Morsnowski, Joachim Müller-Deile, Colleen Psarros, Jon Shallop, Benno Weber, Thomas Wesarg, Andrzej Zarowski, Erwin Offeciers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: AutoNRT is the completely automatic electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measuring algorithm in the recently released Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. AutoNRT allows clinicians to automatically record T-NRT profiles that in turn can be used as a guide for initial fitting. The algorithm consists of a pattern recognition part that judges if the traces contain an ECAP and an intelligent flow that optimizes the measurement parameters and finds the ECAP threshold (T-NRT). The objective of this study was to determine how accurate, reliable, and fast the automatic measurements are.
DESIGN: Data on more than 400 electrodes were collected as part of the multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. T-NRT values determined by the algorithm were compared with T-NRT determinations on the same data by different human observers. Also, the time the measurements took was analyzed.
RESULTS: In 90% of the cases, the absolute difference between the AutoNRT and the human observer determined T-NRT was less than 9 CL; the median absolute difference was 3 CL. A second experiment, in which a group of human observers were asked to analyze NRT data, showed high variability in T-NRT; in some cases, two experienced clinicians disagreed by more than 30 current levels. Compared with the group, AutoNRT performed as well as the "average" clinician, with the advantage that the AutoNRT threshold determinations are objective. Analysis of the timing data showed an average intraoperative measurement time of less than 20 sec per electrode with a standard deviation of 5 sec, suggesting that the total array of 22 electrodes can be measured intraoperatively in about 7 minutes on average.
CONCLUSIONS: AutoNRT provides comparable accuracy to an average clinician but with the added benefit of significant time savings over manual recordings. This makes it a valuable tool for clinical measurement of ECAP threshold in cochlear implant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17609616     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: a validation study.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Erin E Castioni; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Christine P Etler; Sara O'Brien; Lee-Suk Kim
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.

Authors:  E Katelyn Glassman; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Julia King; Ina Shehu; J Thomas Roland; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Tyler C McFayden; Haibo Wang; Katherine E Gill; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; Jianfen Luo; Ruijie Wang; Nancy He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Prediction of the Functional Status of the Cochlear Nerve in Individual Cochlear Implant Users Using Machine Learning and Electrophysiological Measures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Angela Pellittieri; Chloe Vaughan; Xia Ning; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.