Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.

Literature DB >> 27036290

Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the slopes of threshold-versus-pulse-rate functions (multipulse integration, MPI) in humans with cochlear implants in relation to recovery from 300-ms forward maskers. MPI has been correlated with spiral ganglion cell density in animals. The present study showed that steeper MPI functions were correlated with faster recovery from forward masking. The findings suggested that the variations in the MPI slopes are explained not only by the quantity of neurons contributing to the integration process but also by the neurons' temporal response characteristics and possibly central inhibition.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 2016 PMID： 27036290 PMCID： PMC5392067 DOI： 10.1121/1.4943783

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acoust Soc Am ISSN： 0001-4966 Impact factor: 1.840

20 in total

1. Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.

Authors: D A Nelson; G S Donaldson
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 1.840

2. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.

Authors: Bryan E Pfingst; Deborah J Colesa; Sheena Hembrador; Stephen Y Kang; John C Middlebrooks; Yehoash Raphael; Gina L Su
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.840

3. Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors: R V Shannon
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1990-08 Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.

Authors: Colette M McKay
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.840

5. Modeling the additivity of nonsimultaneous masking.

Authors: A J Oxenham; B C Moore
Journal: Hear Res Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 3.208

6. Adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers: a revised model.

Authors: R L Smith; M L Brachman
Journal: Biol Cybern Date: 1982 Impact factor: 2.086

7. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings.

Authors: P H Stypulkowski; C van den Honert
Journal: Hear Res Date: 1984-06 Impact factor: 3.208

8. Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Authors: B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; M Zerbi
Journal: Am J Otol Date: 1997-11

9. Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.

Authors: Michelle L Hughes; Erin E Castioni; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal: Hear Res Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 3.208

10. Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VIIIth nerve to electric stimulation.

Authors: M J Killian; S F Klis; G F Smoorenburg
Journal: Hear Res Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 3.208

11 in total

1. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors: Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.293

2. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors: Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.840

3. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Stimulation Mode.

Authors: Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Mingqi Hang
Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2017-10-30

4. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Authors: Ning Zhou; Juliana Mathews; Lixue Dong
Journal: Hear Res Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 3.208

5. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors: Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal: Hear Res Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 3.208

6. Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors: Tatyana Elizabeth Fontenot; Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Margaret Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Holly F Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin David Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2019 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.570

7. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors: Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 1.840

8. Place-Pitch Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant.

Authors: Natalia Stupak; Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2021 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 3.570

9. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.

Authors: Ning Zhou
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240

10. Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate.

Authors: Susan R S Bissmeyer; Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240