Literature DB >> 22228059

Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Holly K Tabor1, Tracy Brazg, Julia Crouch, Emily E Namey, Stephanie M Fullerton, Laura M Beskow, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

As genetic research is increasingly conducted in children, it is important to understand how parents make decisions about enrolling their children and what they think about receiving their children's genetic research results. We conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 23 parents of children enrolled in genetic studies of autism or diabetes. Qualitative thematic analysis focused on two important components of genetic research and genotype-driven recruitment: participation in genetic research and return of results. Our findings suggest that parents' preferences and perspectives may be specific to their child's disease and the needs of the family as a whole. Assessing the expectations of target research populations will be beneficial for developing best practices for pediatric genetic research, return of results, and genotype-driven recruitment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22228059      PMCID: PMC3426316          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  28 in total

Review 1.  Genetic research on stored tissue samples from minors: a systematic review of the ethical literature.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Herman Nys; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biobanks: oversight offers protection.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; John Wright; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Human tissue samples for research. A focus group study in adults and teenagers in Flanders.

Authors:  K Hens; K Dierickx
Journal:  Genet Couns       Date:  2010

5.  What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.

Authors:  Susan A Treloar; Katherine I Morley; Sandra D Taylor; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

7.  Informed consent for enrolling minors in genetic susceptibility research: a qualitative study of at-risk children's and parents' views about children's role in decision-making.

Authors:  Gail Geller; Ellen S Tambor; Barbara A Bernhardt; Gertrude Fraser; Lawrence S Wissow
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.

Authors:  Kyle Bertram Brothers
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Parents' and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Ellen S Tambor; Gertrude Fraser; Lawrence S Wissow; Gail Geller
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  26 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Namey; Daniel K Nelson; Arlene M Davis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Parents' Understanding of Genetics and Heritability.

Authors:  Brittany Harding; Rylan Egan; Peter Kannu; Jennifer J MacKenzie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Flavia M Facio; Courtney D Berrios
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results.

Authors:  Courtney Berrios; Cynthia A James; Karen Raraigh; Juli Bollinger; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Carolyn D Applegate; Amanda L Bergner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Pharmacogenetics in clinical pediatrics: challenges and strategies.

Authors:  Sara L Van Driest; Tracy L McGregor
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Inclusion of pediatric samples in an opt-out biorepository linking DNA to de-identified medical records: pediatric BioVU.

Authors:  T L McGregor; S L Van Driest; K B Brothers; E A Bowton; L J Muglia; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Factors Influencing Participation in Biospecimen Research among Parents of Youth with Mental Health Conditions.

Authors:  Ashli A Owen-Smith; Musu M Sesay; Frances L Lynch; Maria Massolo; Hilda Cerros; Lisa A Croen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.