Literature DB >> 21691419

Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.

Kyle Bertram Brothers1.   

Abstract

Pediatric biobanks are an indispensible resource for the research that will be needed to bring advances in personalized medicine into pediatric medical care. Investigators developing pediatric biobanks have struggled with the ethical and legal challenges that arise in pediatric research. This article explores how one biobank model, the 'human nonsubjects models', is able to respond to such common challenges as the role of the parent and the child in agreeing to research participation, reconsent at the age of majority, data sharing and return of research results. Although this approach does not involve formal informed consent, it is well-suited to pediatric biobanking owing to its potential to reduce risk to children through a combination of advanced deidentification techniques and extensive oversight.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691419      PMCID: PMC3117295          DOI: 10.2217/pme.10.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  22 in total

1.  Challenges to informed consent.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Ann K Kegley
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  "Human non-subjects research": privacy and compliance.

Authors:  Kyle Bertram Brothers; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Isabel Fortier; Jeantine E Lunshof; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identified biobank.

Authors:  Jill Pulley; Ellen Clayton; Gordon R Bernard; Dan M Roden; Daniel R Masys
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Margaret M Brace; Gordon R Bernard; Dan R Masys
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 9.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  17 in total

1.  Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jennifer L Madison; Kyle B Brothers; Erica A Bowton; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin; Dan M Roden; Jill Pulley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Wylie Burke; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Patient awareness and approval for an opt-out genomic biorepository.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Mathew J Westbrook; M Frances Wright; John A Myers; Daniel R Morrison; Jennifer L Madison; Jill M Pulley; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.

Authors:  Erin D Paquette; Sabrina F Derrington; Avani Shukla; Neha Sinha; Sarah Oswald; Lauren Sorce; Kelly N Michelson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Inclusion of pediatric samples in an opt-out biorepository linking DNA to de-identified medical records: pediatric BioVU.

Authors:  T L McGregor; S L Van Driest; K B Brothers; E A Bowton; L J Muglia; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.

Authors:  Renate D Savich; Beth B Tigges; Lisbeth Iglesias Rios; Joanne McCloskey; Kristine Tollestrup; Robert D Annett
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-28

9.  Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach.

Authors:  Ioana Danciu; James D Cowan; Melissa Basford; Xiaoming Wang; Alexander Saip; Susan Osgood; Jana Shirey-Rice; Jacqueline Kirby; Paul A Harris
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?

Authors:  Jurate Serepkaite; Serepkaite Jurate; Zivile Valuckiene; Valuckiene Zivile; Eugenijus Gefenas; Gefenas Eugenijus
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.