Literature DB >> 12522783

Parents' and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent.

Barbara A Bernhardt1, Ellen S Tambor, Gertrude Fraser, Lawrence S Wissow, Gail Geller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Children at high risk of future disease may be recruited for participation in disease susceptibility research involving genetic testing. This study was aimed at assessing parents' and children's reactions to such research, and their perceptions of risks and benefits of participating.
METHODS: Parents and children (ages 10-17) from families at increased risk for breast cancer (n = 16 dyads) and heart disease (n = 21 dyads) participated in separate audiotaped interviews and a follow-up family interview one year later. We asked about reactions, risks and benefits, and informational needs regarding participation in hypothetical research involving genetic testing on a saliva sample. Audiotape transcripts were analyzed qualitatively.
RESULTS: All children would initially participate because they viewed the research as low risk. When thinking about learning their test result and sharing it with others, or the uncertainties of testing, many children became hesitant about participating. Many parents thought their child might worry about a positive result, making them unlikely to enroll their child, or to choose not to tell the child test results. Both children and parents thought the benefits of participating included early detection or treatment (breast cancer families), prevention (heart disease families) and helping others. Children's questions about research participation centered on details of the study design and purpose, while parents' questions related to the genetic test itself.
CONCLUSIONS: Children's first reaction to participating in research involving genetic susceptibility testing research may not indicate an adequate appreciation of risks and benefits; if encouraged to personalize the impact of genetic testing, children are able to engage in a more informed decision-making process. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12522783     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  22 in total

Review 1.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: a survey of underrepresented parents.

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.

Authors:  Omar F Khabour; Mahmoud A Alomari; Nihaya A Al-Sheyab
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Attitudes of genetic counselors towards genetic susceptibility testing in children.

Authors:  Rishona L Mackoff; Ellen F Iverson; Preston Kiekel; Frederick Dorey; Jeffrey S Upperman; Aida B Metzenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Recruiting underserved populations to dermatologic research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chaya R Spears; Bridgit V Nolan; Jenna L O'Neill; Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.736

7.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Are adolescents with ADHD interested in genetic testing for nicotine addiction susceptibility?

Authors:  Linda J Herbert; Leslie R Walker; McKane E Sharff; Anisha A Abraham; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Feasibility of screening for T1D and celiac disease in a pediatric clinic setting.

Authors:  Patricia D Gesualdo; Kimberly A Bautista; Kathleen C Waugh; Liping Yu; Jill M Norris; Marian J Rewers; Judith Baxter
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.866

10.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.