Literature DB >> 22228056

Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Laura M Beskow1, Emily E Namey, R Jean Cadigan, Tracy Brazg, Julia Crouch, Gail E Henderson, Marsha Michie, Daniel K Nelson, Holly K Tabor, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Genotype-driven recruitment is a potentially powerful approach for studying human genetic variation but presents ethical challenges. We conducted in-depth interviews with research participants in six studies where such recruitment occurred. Nearly all responded favorably to the acceptability of recontact for research recruitment, and genotype-driven recruitment was viewed as a positive sign of scientific advancement. Reactions to questions about the disclosure of individual genetic research results varied. Common themes included explaining the purpose of recontact, informing decisions about further participation, reciprocity, "information is valuable," and the possibility of benefit, as well as concerns about undue distress and misunderstanding. Our findings suggest contact about additional research may be least concerning if it involves a known element (e.g., trusted researchers). Also, for genotype-driven recruitment, it may be appropriate to set a lower bar for disclosure of individual results than the clinical utility threshold recommended more generally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22228056      PMCID: PMC3395316          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  19 in total

1.  The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?

Authors:  Dave Wendler; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-08

2.  Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?

Authors:  Tineke M Meulenkamp; Sjef K Gevers; Jasper A Bovenberg; Gerard H Koppelman; Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Sondra J Smolek
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; Patrick R Miller; Daniel K Nelson; Alexandra Cooper
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 May-Jun

7.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Patricia C Chulada; Heather L Vahdat; Richard R Sharp; Tracy C DeLozier; Paul B Watkins; Susan N Pusek; Perry J Blackshear
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Assessing the understanding of biobank participants.

Authors:  K E Ormond; A L Cirino; I B Helenowski; R L Chisholm; W A Wolf
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke; Stephanie M Fullerton; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Namey; Daniel K Nelson; Arlene M Davis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Authors:  Maureen Wilson-Genderson; K Laura Barker; Heather M Gardiner; Maghboeba Mosavel; Jeffrey Thomas; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".

Authors:  Emily E Namey; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Research altruism as motivation for participation in community-centered environmental health research.

Authors:  Jennifer S Carrera; Phil Brown; Julia Green Brody; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.

Authors:  Deborah R Gordon; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Marguerite Robinson; Wesley O Petersen; Jason S Egginton; Kari G Chaffee; Gloria M Petersen; Susan M Wolf; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-12-31

8.  Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Laura M Beskow; Susan Brown Trinidad; Stephanie M Fullerton; Kathleen Brelsford
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; R Jean Cadigan; Gail Henderson; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.

Authors:  Kathleen M West; Erika Blacksher; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Stephanie M Fullerton; Ebele M Umeukeje; Bessie A Young; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.