Literature DB >> 22622788

Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Laura M Beskow1, Stephanie M Fullerton, Emily E Namey, Daniel K Nelson, Arlene M Davis, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation. However, it also presents significant ethical challenges that, to date, have received only minimal consideration. We convened a multi-disciplinary workshop to discuss key issues relevant to the conduct and oversight of genotype-driven recruitment and to translate those considerations into practical policy recommendations. Workshop participants were invited from around the US, and included genomic researchers and study coordinators, research participants, clinicians, bioethics scholars, experts in human research protections, and government representatives. Discussion was directed by experienced facilitators and informed by empirical data collected in a national survey of IRB chairs and in-depth interviews with research participants in studies where genotype-driven recontact occurred. A high degree of consensus was attained on the resulting seven recommendations, which cover informed consent disclosures and choices, the process for how and by whom participants are recontacted, the disclosure of individual genetic research results, and the importance of tailoring approaches based on specific contextual factors. These recommendations are intended to represent a balanced approach-protecting research participants, yet avoiding overly restrictive policies that hinder advancement on important scientific questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22622788      PMCID: PMC3686635          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1177-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  25 in total

1.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Kristen N Linney; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Maintaining informed consent validity during lengthy research protocols.

Authors:  Kristen J Prentice; Paul S Appelbaum; Robert R Conley; William T Carpenter
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

4.  Public expectations for return of results--time to stop being paternalistic?

Authors:  Conrad Fernandez
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Sean E McGuire; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Multidimensional results reporting to participants in genomic studies: getting it right.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Patrick L Taylor
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Robert S Sandler; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Patricia C Chulada; Heather L Vahdat; Richard R Sharp; Tracy C DeLozier; Paul B Watkins; Susan N Pusek; Perry J Blackshear
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Christensen; M Giacomini; J S Robert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  11 in total

1.  Engaging Hmong adults in genomic and pharmacogenomic research: Toward reducing health disparities in genomic knowledge using a community-based participatory research approach.

Authors:  Kathleen A Culhane-Pera; Robert J Straka; MaiKia Moua; Youssef Roman; Pachia Vue; Kang Xiaaj; May Xia Lo; Mai Lor
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-01-10

2.  Harms of Deception in FMR1 Premutation Genotype-Driven Recruitment.

Authors:  Sam Doernberg; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 3.  Biobanks and personalized medicine.

Authors:  J E Olson; S J Bielinski; E Ryu; E M Winkler; P Y Takahashi; J Pathak; J R Cerhan
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Clinical Genetic Testing for APOL1: Are we There Yet?

Authors:  Bessie A Young; Stephanie Malia Fullerton; James G Wilson; Kerri Cavanaugh; Erika Blacksher; Clarence Spigner; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Genotype-based recall to study metabolic effects of genetic variation: a pilot study of PPARG Pro12Ala carriers.

Authors:  Prasad G Kamble; Stefan Gustafsson; Maria J Pereira; Per Lundkvist; Naomi Cook; Lars Lind; Paul W Franks; Tove Fall; Jan W Eriksson; Erik Ingelsson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.

Authors:  Joel T Minion; Frances Butcher; Nicholas Timpson; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.

Authors:  Deborah Mascalzoni; Roberta Biasiotto; Max Borsche; Norbert Brüggemann; Alessandro De Grandi; Martin Goegele; Sara Frygner-Holm; Christine Klein; Maria Kösters; Ciara Staunton; Peter P Pramstaller; Michael Krawczak; Andrew A Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Kaitlin J Soye; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Genetics, sleep and memory: a recall-by-genotype study of ZNF804A variants and sleep neurophysiology.

Authors:  Charlotte Hellmich; Claire Durant; Matthew W Jones; Nicholas J Timpson; Ullrich Bartsch; Laura J Corbin
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 10.  Formalising recall by genotype as an efficient approach to detailed phenotyping and causal inference.

Authors:  Laura J Corbin; Vanessa Y Tan; David A Hughes; Kaitlin H Wade; Dirk S Paul; Katherine E Tansey; Frances Butcher; Frank Dudbridge; Joanna M Howson; Momodou W Jallow; Catherine John; Nathalie Kingston; Cecilia M Lindgren; Michael O'Donavan; Stephen O'Rahilly; Michael J Owen; Colin N A Palmer; Ewan R Pearson; Robert A Scott; David A van Heel; John Whittaker; Tim Frayling; Martin D Tobin; Louise V Wain; George Davey Smith; David M Evans; Fredrik Karpe; Mark I McCarthy; John Danesh; Paul W Franks; Nicholas J Timpson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.