Literature DB >> 15455364

Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Laura M Beskow1, Jeffrey R Botkin, Mary Daly, Eric T Juengst, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Jon F Merz, Rebecca Pentz, Nancy A Press, Lainie Friedman Ross, Jeremy Sugarman, Lisa R Susswein, Sharon F Terry, Melissa A Austin, Wylie Burke.   

Abstract

Family-based research is essential to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of human disease. The success of family-based research often depends on investigators' ability to identify, recruit, and achieve a high participation rate among eligible family members. However, recruitment of family members raises ethical concerns due to the tension between protecting participants' privacy and promoting research quality, and guidelines for these activities are not well established. The Cancer Genetics Network Bioethics Committee assembled a multidisciplinary group to explore the scientific and ethical issues that arise in the process of family-based recruitment. The group used a literature review as well as expert opinion to develop recommendations about appropriate approaches to identifying, contacting, and recruiting family members. We conclude that there is no single correct approach, but recommend a balanced approach that takes into account the nature of the particular study as well as its recruitment goals. Recruitment of family members should be viewed as part of the research protocol and should require appropriate informed consent of the already-enrolled participant. Investigators should inform prospective participants why they are being contacted, how information about them was obtained, and what will happen to that information if they decide not to participate. The recruitment process should also be sensitive to the fact that some individuals from families at increased genetic risk will have no prior knowledge of their risk status. These recommendations are put forward to promote further discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to family-based recruitment. They suggest a framework for considering alternative recruitment strategies and their implications, as well as highlight areas in need of further empirical research. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15455364     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  23 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Kristen N Linney; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Public opinions about participating in health research.

Authors:  Kay Teschke; Suhail Marino; Rong Chu; Joseph K C Tsui; M Anne Harris; Stephen A Marion
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

4.  ASHG Presidential Address: Who is under the umbrella--and why are we here?

Authors:  Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research.

Authors:  Patricia A Marshall; Clement A Adebamowo; Adebowale A Adeyemo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Mirjana Vekich; Teri Strenski; Jie Zhou; T Elaine Prewitt; Richard S Cooper; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Namey; Daniel K Nelson; Arlene M Davis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Recruitment of representative samples for low incidence cancer populations: do registries deliver?

Authors:  Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko Carey; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Tracey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Robert S Sandler; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; Patrick R Miller; Daniel K Nelson; Alexandra Cooper
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 May-Jun

10.  Genetic research on rare familial disorders: consent and the blurred boundaries between clinical service and research.

Authors:  M Ponder; H Statham; N Hallowell; J A Moon; M Richards; F L Raymond
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.