Literature DB >> 26479563

How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Ellen Wright Clayton1.   

Abstract

Adolescents may often have opinions about whether they want genetic and genomic testing in both the clinic and research and about who should have access to the results. This legal analysis demonstrates that the law provides very little protection to minors' wishes.
© 2015 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26479563      PMCID: PMC4617197          DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  36 in total

1.  Mothers and daughters from breast cancer families: a qualitative study of their perceptions of risks and benefits associated with minor's participation in genetic susceptibility research.

Authors:  G Geller; E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; L S Wissow; G Fraser
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  2000

2.  Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation.

Authors:  H A Hamann; R T Croyle; V L Venne; B J Baty; K R Smith; J R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-05-01

3.  Decision-making by adolescents and parents of children with cancer regarding health research participation.

Authors:  Kate Read; Conrad Vincent Fernandez; Jun Gao; Caron Strahlendorf; Albert Moghrabi; Rebecca Davis Pentz; Raymond Carlton Barfield; Justin Nathaniel Baker; Darcy Santor; Charles Weijer; Eric Kodish
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Laurence B McCullough; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven Joffe; Lainie Friedman Ross; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Parents' preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  S I Ziniel; S K Savage; N Huntington; J Amatruda; R C Green; E R Weitzman; P Taylor; I A Holm
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Regulatory changes raise troubling questions for genomic testing.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Michael O Dorschner; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  ACMG policy statement: updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.

Authors:  Ingrid A Holm; Sarah K Savage; Robert C Green; Eric Juengst; Amy McGuire; Susan Kornetsky; Stephanie J Brewster; Steven Joffe; Patrick Taylor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Honey, I Sequenced the Kids: Preventive Genomics and the Complexities of Adolescence.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  An Observational Study of Children's Involvement in Informed Consent for Exome Sequencing Research.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Allison Werner-Lin; Sarah A Walser; Sawona Biswas; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 5.  Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.

Authors:  T J Kasperbauer; Colin Halverson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.