Literature DB >> 30653790

Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.

Katie L Lewis1, Flavia M Facio1, Courtney D Berrios2,3.   

Abstract

Exome and genome sequencing (EGS) are increasingly the genetic testing modalities of choice among researchers owing to their ready availability, low cost, and large data output. Recruitment of larger, more diverse cohorts into long-term studies with extensive data collection is fundamental to the success of EGS research and to the widespread benefit of genomic medicine to various populations. Effective engagement will be critical to meeting this demand. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) model provides a framework for how new technologies are adopted in communities, including antecedents of an individual's decision to adopt the technology, how the technology's attributes influence its acceptability, the predictors of sustained use of that technology, and its diffusion through society. We apply the DOI model to frame participant engagement in EGS research and to guide the proposal of potential strategies that aim to overcome forecasted challenges. Finally, we suggest a variety of ways genetic counselors can apply their skills and training to the development and implementation of these strategies. © Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion of innovation; diversity; early adopters; engagement; exome sequencing; genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30653790      PMCID: PMC6456416          DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  53 in total

Review 1.  Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Susan K Peterson; Amelie Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Paige Green McDonald; Celette Sugg Skinner; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The Role of the Health Care Provider in Building Trust Between Patients and Precision Medicine Research Programs.

Authors:  Anitra Persaud; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Leila Jamal; Jill O Robinson; Kurt D Christensen; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Melody J Slashinski; Denise Lautenbach Perry; Jason L Vassy; Julia Wycliff; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-01-27

4.  National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The study is open: Participants are now recruiting investigators.

Authors:  Sharon F Terry
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Paul K J Han; Gillian W Hooker; William M P Klein; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.

Authors:  Martha F Wright; Katie L Lewis; Tyler C Fisher; Gillian W Hooker; Toby E Emanuel; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Expectation versus Reality: The Impact of Utility on Emotional Outcomes after Returning Individualized Genetic Research Results in Pediatric Rare Disease Research, a Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Cara N Cacioppo; Ariel E Chandler; Meghan C Towne; Alan H Beggs; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Rebecca Baker; Lauren C Milner; Stephanie Devaney; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Enhancing the participation of african americans in health-related genetic research: findings of a collaborative academic and community-based research study.

Authors:  Sandra Millon Underwood; Aaron G Buseh; Sheryl T Kelber; Patricia E Stevens; Leolia Townsend
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.