Literature DB >> 22228058

The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

R Jean Cadigan1, Marsha Michie, Gail Henderson, Arlene M Davis, Laura M Beskow.   

Abstract

In the debate about whether to return individual genetic results to research participants, consideration of the nature of results has taken precedence over contextual factors associated with different study designs and populations. We conducted in-depth interviews with 24 individuals who participated in a genotype-driven study of cystic fibrosis: 9 of the individuals had cystic fibrosis, 15 had participated as healthy volunteers, and all had gene variants of interest to the researchers. These interviews revealed that the two groups had different ideas about the meaningfulness of genetic results. Our findings point to the importance of understanding research context, such as participants' relationship with the researcher and whether they have the disease condition under study, when considering whether to return individual results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22228058      PMCID: PMC3386306          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  18 in total

1.  A closer look: are we subjects or are we donors?

Authors:  Rebecca Fisher
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 2.  Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity?

Authors:  K Hoeyer
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Genetic modifiers of lung disease in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Mitchell L Drumm; Michael W Konstan; Mark D Schluchter; Allison Handler; Rhonda Pace; Fei Zou; Maimoona Zariwala; David Fargo; Airong Xu; John M Dunn; Rebecca J Darrah; Ruslan Dorfman; Andrew J Sandford; Mary Corey; Julian Zielenski; Peter Durie; Katrina Goddard; James R Yankaskas; Fred A Wright; Michael R Knowles
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Patricia C Chulada; Heather L Vahdat; Richard R Sharp; Tracy C DeLozier; Paul B Watkins; Susan N Pusek; Perry J Blackshear
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.

Authors:  F A Miller; R Christensen; M Giacomini; J S Robert
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  18 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Ethics and policy issues for stem cell research and pulmonary medicine.

Authors:  Justin Lowenthal; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Namey; Daniel K Nelson; Arlene M Davis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Authors:  Maureen Wilson-Genderson; K Laura Barker; Heather M Gardiner; Maghboeba Mosavel; Jeffrey Thomas; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Xue Zhang; Brooke McLaughlin; Diane Kissell; Cassandra L Perry; Matthew Veerkamp; Kejian Zhang; Ingrid A Holm; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".

Authors:  Emily E Namey; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.

Authors:  S Daack-Hirsch; M Driessnack; A Hanish; V A Johnson; L L Shah; C M Simon; J K Williams
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; R Jean Cadigan; Gail Henderson; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.