Literature DB >> 22935717

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.

Marsha Michie1, R Jean Cadigan, Gail Henderson, Laura M Beskow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genotype-driven research recruitment complicates traditional study roles and may leave those recruited worried about unwelcome surprises from their DNA. This study investigated the ways that individuals experience genotype-driven recruitment, and conceptualize their roles as research participants.
METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with the participants of a genotype-driven study on cystic fibrosis. The eligibility criteria included the presence of one of two genetic variants. We interviewed 24 of these participants: 9 had cystic fibrosis and 15 had been selected from a biobank as "healthy volunteers."
RESULTS: Participants with cystic fibrosis expressed no concerns about the eligibility criteria and saw themselves as part of a close-knit research community. However, biobank participants were unsure about why they had been selected and how they should think about themselves relative to the study. They sometimes reacted with anxiety to genetic information that they perceived to connect them with cystic fibrosis.
CONCLUSION: Being recruited for a study on the basis of one's genotype may raise uncertainties about the meaning and implications of the genotypic information. People without the disease under study may require especially clear and detailed explanations of what researchers already know about their genetic makeup, in terms of future risk for themselves or their children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22935717      PMCID: PMC3578310          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  10 in total

1.  Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Kristen N Linney; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Sean E McGuire; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Genetic modifiers of lung disease in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Mitchell L Drumm; Michael W Konstan; Mark D Schluchter; Allison Handler; Rhonda Pace; Fei Zou; Maimoona Zariwala; David Fargo; Airong Xu; John M Dunn; Rebecca J Darrah; Ruslan Dorfman; Andrew J Sandford; Mary Corey; Julian Zielenski; Peter Durie; Katrina Goddard; James R Yankaskas; Fred A Wright; Michael R Knowles
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Modifier genes in Mendelian disorders: the example of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Garry R Cutting
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".

Authors:  Emily E Namey; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry: a DNA resource to study genetic susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Patricia C Chulada; Heather L Vahdat; Richard R Sharp; Tracy C DeLozier; Paul B Watkins; Susan N Pusek; Perry J Blackshear
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Elizabeth Dean
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.254

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The ethics conundrum in Recall by Genotype (RbG) research: Perspectives from birth cohort participants.

Authors:  Joel T Minion; Frances Butcher; Nicholas Timpson; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katharina Tschigg; Luca Consoli; Roberta Biasiotto; Deborah Mascalzoni
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.351

4.  Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.

Authors:  Deborah Mascalzoni; Roberta Biasiotto; Max Borsche; Norbert Brüggemann; Alessandro De Grandi; Martin Goegele; Sara Frygner-Holm; Christine Klein; Maria Kösters; Ciara Staunton; Peter P Pramstaller; Michael Krawczak; Andrew A Hicks
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Kaitlin J Soye; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.063

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.