PURPOSE: Genotype-driven research recruitment complicates traditional study roles and may leave those recruited worried about unwelcome surprises from their DNA. This study investigated the ways that individuals experience genotype-driven recruitment, and conceptualize their roles as research participants. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with the participants of a genotype-driven study on cystic fibrosis. The eligibility criteria included the presence of one of two genetic variants. We interviewed 24 of these participants: 9 had cystic fibrosis and 15 had been selected from a biobank as "healthy volunteers." RESULTS: Participants with cystic fibrosis expressed no concerns about the eligibility criteria and saw themselves as part of a close-knit research community. However, biobank participants were unsure about why they had been selected and how they should think about themselves relative to the study. They sometimes reacted with anxiety to genetic information that they perceived to connect them with cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Being recruited for a study on the basis of one's genotype may raise uncertainties about the meaning and implications of the genotypic information. People without the disease under study may require especially clear and detailed explanations of what researchers already know about their genetic makeup, in terms of future risk for themselves or their children.
PURPOSE: Genotype-driven research recruitment complicates traditional study roles and may leave those recruited worried about unwelcome surprises from their DNA. This study investigated the ways that individuals experience genotype-driven recruitment, and conceptualize their roles as research participants. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with the participants of a genotype-driven study on cystic fibrosis. The eligibility criteria included the presence of one of two genetic variants. We interviewed 24 of these participants: 9 had cystic fibrosis and 15 had been selected from a biobank as "healthy volunteers." RESULTS: Participants with cystic fibrosis expressed no concerns about the eligibility criteria and saw themselves as part of a close-knit research community. However, biobank participants were unsure about why they had been selected and how they should think about themselves relative to the study. They sometimes reacted with anxiety to genetic information that they perceived to connect them with cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Being recruited for a study on the basis of one's genotype may raise uncertainties about the meaning and implications of the genotypic information. People without the disease under study may require especially clear and detailed explanations of what researchers already know about their genetic makeup, in terms of future risk for themselves or their children.
Authors: Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; R Jean Cadigan; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Gail E Henderson; Marsha Michie; Daniel K Nelson; Holly K Tabor; Benjamin S Wilfond Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Laura M Beskow; Kristen N Linney; Rodney A Radtke; Erin L Heinzen; David B Goldstein Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Mitchell L Drumm; Michael W Konstan; Mark D Schluchter; Allison Handler; Rhonda Pace; Fei Zou; Maimoona Zariwala; David Fargo; Airong Xu; John M Dunn; Rebecca J Darrah; Ruslan Dorfman; Andrew J Sandford; Mary Corey; Julian Zielenski; Peter Durie; Katrina Goddard; James R Yankaskas; Fred A Wright; Michael R Knowles Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Holly K Tabor; Tracy Brazg; Julia Crouch; Emily E Namey; Stephanie M Fullerton; Laura M Beskow; Benjamin S Wilfond Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Patricia C Chulada; Heather L Vahdat; Richard R Sharp; Tracy C DeLozier; Paul B Watkins; Susan N Pusek; Perry J Blackshear Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Deborah Mascalzoni; Roberta Biasiotto; Max Borsche; Norbert Brüggemann; Alessandro De Grandi; Martin Goegele; Sara Frygner-Holm; Christine Klein; Maria Kösters; Ciara Staunton; Peter P Pramstaller; Michael Krawczak; Andrew A Hicks Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Kaitlin J Soye; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 3.063